[CCAMP] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[John Scudder via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am balloting DISCUSS to ensure this point isn't missed, but intend to convert
to YES; this is an excellent document.

Please don't forget to consider Tom Petch's review,
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/akNb8PDxCI5lw-HWx474EcMp1Cg/ In
particular, Tom points out some references to possibly-outdated external
specifications.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In section 4.4 you mention OTN LTPs, I assume you're talking about "logical
termination points". Please consider expanding LTP, I did check in RFC 7062 to
see if it's defined there; it's not.

Also, when you produce a new version, please make sure you update the 2022
dates... unless there's some reason not to?