Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Mon, 18 March 2013 17:04 UTC
Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1070921F85E8 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1k8Q3CnoJlXx for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADE621F8FF4 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id APN45365; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:02:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:01:34 +0000
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:02:25 +0000
Received: from dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.15.217]) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.203]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:01:18 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
Thread-Index: Ac4f8jXST9mgvOOvRNWzpwVTcHtPqwAMrVOgADgSpqAAFs4/kACs7BkAAAaacFA=
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:02:16 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911DC5E@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <8DC6547C806B644F998A0566E79E15920F7DFF60@DEMUMBX006.nsn-intra.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911828D@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> <8DC6547C806B644F998A0566E79E15920F7E1284@DEMUMBX006.nsn-intra.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911D7BA@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> <51471168.3000400@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <51471168.3000400@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.130.32]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:04:02 -0000
Hi Lou, The encoding is a part of the Resource Block (that includes Regenerators and Wavelength converters) which is a WSON specific entity. Regards, Young -----Original Message----- From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:07 AM To: Leeyoung; CCAMP Cc: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich); draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19 Young/All, Some of the discussions last week (on 709 and dimitri's) got me thinking more about the inclusion of G-PID on the wson specific encoding. As G-PID and other client/input information is not technology specific, and it looks like there's a likely a need for a general solution, shouldn't the G-PID (and other 'client/input') information be in draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode? Thoughts? Lou On 3/15/2013 5:35 AM, Leeyoung wrote: > Thanks. > > Young > > -----Original Message----- > From: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 5:53 PM > To: Leeyoung; CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org > Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19 > > > Hi, > > Thanks for the quick feedback. As this introduce a dependency with the GPID, > the text should indicate that the number of bit rate MUST match the number of GPID. > > Other than that I think this is acceptable > > > > Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Cyril Margaria > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ext Leeyoung [mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:33 PM >> To: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich); CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa- >> wson-encode@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19 >> >> Hi Cyril, >> >> Thanks for your comment. >> >> This refers to the "Input Bit Rate" of the associated client Signal >> Type in the RB. >> Below is a new section 5.4 that defines Input Bit Rate List Sub-Sub- >> TLV. We removed "range" from this Sub-Sub-TLV. >> >> Let me know if this is acceptable. >> >> Thanks. >> Young >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> 5.4. Input Bit Rate List Sub-Sub-TLV >> >> This sub-sub-TLV contains a list of bit rate of each input client >> signal types specified in the Input Client Signal List Sub-Sub-TLV. >> Type := Input Bit Rate List >> Value := IEEE 32-bit IEEE Floating Point >> >> 0 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Input Bit Rate of GPID #1 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> : : >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Input Bit Rate of GPID #N | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf >> Of Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich) >> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:54 AM >> To: CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19 >> >> Dear Authors, >> >> I have the following comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19 >> >> Section 5.1 Resource Block Information Sub-TLV >> >> The sub-TLV format defines the "Input Bit Rate Range List Sub-Sub-TLV >> (opt)" >> No section defines the Input Bit range List Sub-Sub-TLV, while it was >> present in the previous version. >> >> I think the section should be re-added. >> >> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards >> Cyril Margaria >> >> Nokia Siemens Networks Optical GmbH >> St.Martin-Str. 76 >> D-81541 München >> Germany >> mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com >> Phone: +49-89-5159-16934 >> Fax: +49-89-5159-44-16934 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Nokia Siemens Networks Optical GmbH >> Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Gero Neumeier, Dr. Rolf Nauerz >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich >> Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 197143 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCAMP mailing list >> CCAMP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > > >
- [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-enc… Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson… Lou Berger