Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Mon, 18 March 2013 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1070921F85E8 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1k8Q3CnoJlXx for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADE621F8FF4 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id APN45365; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:02:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:01:34 +0000
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:02:25 +0000
Received: from dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.15.217]) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.203]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:01:18 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
Thread-Index: Ac4f8jXST9mgvOOvRNWzpwVTcHtPqwAMrVOgADgSpqAAFs4/kACs7BkAAAaacFA=
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:02:16 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911DC5E@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <8DC6547C806B644F998A0566E79E15920F7DFF60@DEMUMBX006.nsn-intra.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911828D@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> <8DC6547C806B644F998A0566E79E15920F7E1284@DEMUMBX006.nsn-intra.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911D7BA@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> <51471168.3000400@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <51471168.3000400@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.130.32]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:04:02 -0000

Hi Lou,

The encoding is a part of the Resource Block (that includes Regenerators and Wavelength converters) which is a WSON specific entity.

Regards,
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:07 AM
To: Leeyoung; CCAMP
Cc: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich); draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19

Young/All,

Some of the discussions last week (on 709 and dimitri's) got me thinking
more about the inclusion of G-PID on the wson specific encoding.  As
G-PID and other client/input information is not technology specific, and
it looks like there's a likely a need for a general solution, shouldn't
the G-PID (and other 'client/input') information be in
draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode?

Thoughts?

Lou

On 3/15/2013 5:35 AM, Leeyoung wrote:
> Thanks. 
> 
> Young
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 5:53 PM
> To: Leeyoung; CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Thanks for the quick feedback. As this introduce a dependency with the GPID, 
> the text should indicate that the number of bit rate MUST match the number of GPID.
> 
> Other than that I think this is acceptable
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Cyril Margaria
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Leeyoung [mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:33 PM
>> To: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich); CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-
>> wson-encode@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
>>
>> Hi Cyril,
>>
>> Thanks for your comment.
>>
>> This refers to the "Input Bit Rate" of the associated client Signal
>> Type in the RB.
>> Below is a new section 5.4 that defines Input Bit Rate List Sub-Sub-
>> TLV. We removed "range" from this Sub-Sub-TLV.
>>
>> Let me know if this is acceptable.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Young
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 5.4. Input Bit Rate List Sub-Sub-TLV
>>
>> This sub-sub-TLV contains a list of bit rate of each input client
>> signal types specified in the Input Client Signal List Sub-Sub-TLV.
>> Type := Input Bit Rate List
>> Value := IEEE 32-bit IEEE Floating Point
>>
>>    0                   1                   2                   3
>>    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>   |       	          Input Bit Rate of GPID #1		    	|
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>   :                                                               :
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>   |       	          Input Bit Rate of GPID #N		           	|
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:54 AM
>> To: CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
>>
>> Dear Authors,
>>
>> I have the following comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
>>
>> Section 5.1  Resource Block Information Sub-TLV
>>
>> The sub-TLV format defines the "Input Bit Rate Range List  Sub-Sub-TLV
>> (opt)"
>> No section defines the Input Bit range List Sub-Sub-TLV, while it was
>> present in the previous version.
>>
>> I think the section should be re-added.
>>
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
>> Cyril Margaria
>>
>> Nokia Siemens Networks Optical GmbH
>> St.Martin-Str. 76
>> D-81541 München
>> Germany
>> mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com
>> Phone: +49-89-5159-16934
>> Fax:   +49-89-5159-44-16934
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Nokia Siemens Networks Optical GmbH
>> Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Gero Neumeier, Dr. Rolf Nauerz
>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich
>> Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 197143
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
>