Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 18 March 2013 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F1021F8DA2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4NKsCAj+NZ0o for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.16.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DA21721F8D9A for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4710 invoked by uid 0); 18 Mar 2013 13:06:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy13.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2013 13:06:48 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=YKR2lucxFk3PQojhXWZTa55pWemSoHCLo+S5AL/3bUs=; b=CBQ0ae5QoD/vCXExKaZkDr4P1ImoAKFTyhFIn6kcOTCfJCuUZkoY60bDnxk3oK+y1hTgNtKsPW6m8DF3Qr1dEooScHyVmqO4RtMusTEzeBI97KDKI/66+yo8r+pECZCg;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:36335 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1UHZm4-0004TA-Gi; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:06:48 -0600
Message-ID: <51471168.3000400@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:06:48 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <8DC6547C806B644F998A0566E79E15920F7DFF60@DEMUMBX006.nsn-intra.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911828D@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> <8DC6547C806B644F998A0566E79E15920F7E1284@DEMUMBX006.nsn-intra.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911D7BA@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172911D7BA@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:07:15 -0000

Young/All,

Some of the discussions last week (on 709 and dimitri's) got me thinking
more about the inclusion of G-PID on the wson specific encoding.  As
G-PID and other client/input information is not technology specific, and
it looks like there's a likely a need for a general solution, shouldn't
the G-PID (and other 'client/input') information be in
draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode?

Thoughts?

Lou

On 3/15/2013 5:35 AM, Leeyoung wrote:
> Thanks. 
> 
> Young
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 5:53 PM
> To: Leeyoung; CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Thanks for the quick feedback. As this introduce a dependency with the GPID, 
> the text should indicate that the number of bit rate MUST match the number of GPID.
> 
> Other than that I think this is acceptable
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Cyril Margaria
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Leeyoung [mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:33 PM
>> To: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich); CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-
>> wson-encode@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
>>
>> Hi Cyril,
>>
>> Thanks for your comment.
>>
>> This refers to the "Input Bit Rate" of the associated client Signal
>> Type in the RB.
>> Below is a new section 5.4 that defines Input Bit Rate List Sub-Sub-
>> TLV. We removed "range" from this Sub-Sub-TLV.
>>
>> Let me know if this is acceptable.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Young
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 5.4. Input Bit Rate List Sub-Sub-TLV
>>
>> This sub-sub-TLV contains a list of bit rate of each input client
>> signal types specified in the Input Client Signal List Sub-Sub-TLV.
>> Type := Input Bit Rate List
>> Value := IEEE 32-bit IEEE Floating Point
>>
>>    0                   1                   2                   3
>>    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>   |       	          Input Bit Rate of GPID #1		    	|
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>   :                                                               :
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>   |       	          Input Bit Rate of GPID #N		           	|
>>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:54 AM
>> To: CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
>>
>> Dear Authors,
>>
>> I have the following comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-19
>>
>> Section 5.1  Resource Block Information Sub-TLV
>>
>> The sub-TLV format defines the "Input Bit Rate Range List  Sub-Sub-TLV
>> (opt)"
>> No section defines the Input Bit range List Sub-Sub-TLV, while it was
>> present in the previous version.
>>
>> I think the section should be re-added.
>>
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
>> Cyril Margaria
>>
>> Nokia Siemens Networks Optical GmbH
>> St.Martin-Str. 76
>> D-81541 München
>> Germany
>> mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com
>> Phone: +49-89-5159-16934
>> Fax:   +49-89-5159-44-16934
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Nokia Siemens Networks Optical GmbH
>> Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Gero Neumeier, Dr. Rolf Nauerz
>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich
>> Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 197143
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
>