RE: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt

Martin Dubuc <martin.dubuc@edgeflow.com> Tue, 19 June 2001 16:39 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:42:39 -0700
Message-ID: <89E067900D3FA84A97495C71556140E41B6297@edgsvr01.edgeflow.edgeflow.com>
From: Martin Dubuc <martin.dubuc@edgeflow.com>
To: 'Kireeti Kompella' <kireeti@juniper.net>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:39:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I also agree that LMP should be a CCAMP document and would also like to see
it explicitly added to CCAMP charter.

Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:kireeti@juniper.net]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:04 PM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt


Hi All,

Once upon a time, there was consensus to make the above document
(URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-mpls-lmp-02.txt )
an MPLS WG document.

It now falls under the purvey of CCAMP.  Question: do you think this
document should be a CCAMP WG document?  (You know the drill ....)

Kireeti & Vijay.