Re: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt

[Yong Xue <[e-mail]>]

I think lmp should be a ccamp wg document, at the same time second
Tom's suggestion to add lmp into the charter.

/Yong

On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Thomas D. Nadeau wrote:

> 
> >Once upon a time, there was consensus to make the above document
> >(URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-mpls-lmp-02.txt )
> >an MPLS WG document.
> >
> >It now falls under the purvey of CCAMP.  Question: do you think this
> >document should be a CCAMP WG document?  (You know the drill ....)
> 
>          Yes, I think that it should be a CCAMP wg document.
> However, in leu of the recent discussions regarding
> whether drafts are in or out of charter, I suggest that
> we explicitly add LMP to the charter to put to rest
> any doubts of its applicability to ccamp.
> 
>          --Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
>