IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt

"Irfan Lateef" <irfanlateef@hotmail.com> Wed, 20 June 2001 00:15 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:18:05 -0700
From: Irfan Lateef <irfanlateef@hotmail.com>
To: kireeti@juniper.net, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:15:45 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <F248TJTBUslpIWLHJb50000e665@hotmail.com>

Kireeti,

How many response are required before it is deemed consensus?

Apologize if it is documented in some RFC. But I am asking because in
future if I see "N" responses I will not send mine if it is the
same and conserve some bandwidth.

Belated, but I also think it should be in CCAMP.

Irfan Lateef

>From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Hi All,
>
>Once upon a time, there was consensus to make the above document
>(URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-mpls-lmp-02.txt )
>an MPLS WG document.
>
>It now falls under the purvey of CCAMP.  Question: do you think this
>document should be a CCAMP WG document?  (You know the drill ....)
>
>Kireeti & Vijay.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email