Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05: (with COMMENT)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 09 August 2015 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C261ACEBA; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 09:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lt5fzLtPy7rx; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 539221ACEA9; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t79G7w5l016453; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:07:58 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (79.135.99.37.dsl.gradwelldsl.co.uk [79.135.99.37] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t79G7uss016421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:07:57 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Kathleen Moriarty' <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 17:07:58 +0100
Message-ID: <023a01d0d2bd$8fec62f0$afc528d0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdDSvYwssh2h30AHS1uTW9pnZx2a7g==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-8.0.0.1202-21736.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.366-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--16.366-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: oTBA/+sdKaanykMun0J1wgIKV2KH2USqC/ExpXrHizzagsZM0qVv140e ly2iMqdYi8fNyReXJq2VLzO9Mz4bMsMHYrhrnliooJLkW6Ru4giTxSVdDMsZvOOxOq7LQlGLwRA 6rpuI8rQvo4lSrODC/P+llZdZsNcpG1CvAg7R8yTmqFqd3TBAA0Crr/LkAQ46V9eB8vnmKe8Xnx dWTEAtaZjNJW4CxsDoXJxUqP5Y2c0wfXl56Qt5SMLRNemq17EifS0Ip2eEHny+qryzYw2E8H2PY bDNMTe9KrauXd3MZDUD/dHyT/Xh7Q==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/gOR0QKxVg9QTciDJJi-510QwR2I>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk.ad@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk@ietf.org, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk.shepherd@ietf.org, 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 16:08:09 -0000

Thanks Kathleen,

Glad to see this planning.

> Just one comment letting you know about progress on one of your points below.

[snip]

> > Can I suggest that you hold a BoF in Yokohama entitled "Security of the
Routing
> > and Signaling Infrastructure". You can invite to this meeting the relevant
> > routing experts, and you can arrange for presentations from the security
> > experts who can show what the problems are.
> 
> We are working with Alia on security Webex sessions for the routing area.
> Hopefully, we will be able to have one near term that stems from work on the
> SFC architecture draft that recently went through IESG review.  The other one
will
> be at least 3 months out due to availability of the expert.  

That's a little ugly. No criticism of the person who is unavailable for the next
three months, but Stephen makes it sound like there are known problems and
issues that should be addressed soon. Is there only one expert who could help
with this?

> If something was done in Japan, then I'd like to make sure it was recorded
> for anyone who could not attend and didn't want to watch it when they are
>  not at their best for learning (middle of the night).

Sure. I think Meetecho routinely record all BoFs.

A