[CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 05 August 2015 22:09 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6923C1ACD57; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kZgP_eNffeyt; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271561ACD54; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.3.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150805220817.431.69640.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:08:17 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/ljtDtizVxe4BfPc8eyAnKJqOnqU>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk.ad@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:09:20 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - (Nearly a discuss) Section 7 refers back to RFC5920 (from 5 years ago) and RFC6163 (presumably the 3 paragraph section 7) and also claims that there is "no substantial reason to to expect the security considerations to be any different." That's pretty unimpressive to be honest. Don't you think it'd be reasonable to expect that a new architecture, framework and set of protocols for high speed networks should today include a thorough security and privacy analysis done afresh and not simply referring back to previous work? For example, is it not likely that in some cases new IGP security primitives might be needed, or that virtualisation and data centre trends would mean that some additional isolation between different folks' data was desirable or that some kind of automated key management be finally required to be included from the start of the design of any new control plane? (This isn't a discuss as it's probably better to hold that kind of discussion for a next stage when some architecture or protocols are defined.) - typo: trnaponders, I like it:-)
- [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Ramon Casellas