Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-tunnel-num-04.txt
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 10 October 2012 11:00 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A50321F8514 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 04:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.827
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.827 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.116, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGL4cqLXixzU for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 04:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F1DA121F8508 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 04:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7238 invoked by uid 0); 10 Oct 2012 11:00:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2012 11:00:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=tVkKvuW8U6M+nyfFUjYmL+70EwPt7+u1XRbseP7ftxY=; b=AZjOCBEBtc5bkhFOVMw/Sl9pUyAKmxBzcZ6rcTJxbuZFSY1NpAwIgh+sPEA6YyGhFj71Kkj7U6Fj2MjxB8bxcdJkHWXtMDoFeyGV1Qn5bwim77rLP8W8F4zMWQL2pVJl;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:39981 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1TLu1y-00010c-06; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:00:50 -0600
Message-ID: <5075555F.7000803@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:00:47 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn
References: <OFA48A9A0D.5DBFA052-ON48257A93.00253CEF-48257A93.00263DDA@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OFA48A9A0D.5DBFA052-ON48257A93.00253CEF-48257A93.00263DDA@zte.com.cn>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-tunnel-num-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:00:53 -0000
fyi - changing the title in the text doesn't require a change in the filename, and such a change just confuses things/people... On 10/10/2012 2:57 AM, zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn wrote: > > Hi Lou > > We have finished the editing according to your suggestion, please help > review the draft to see whether another roll of revision is needed. > > > A new version of I-D, draft-zvxg-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-id-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Fei Zhang and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-zvxg-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-id > Revision: 00 > Title: RSVP-TE Identification of > MPLS-TP Co-Routed Bidirectional LSP > Creation date: 2012-10-12 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 8 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zvxg-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-id-00.txt > Status: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zvxg-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-id > Htmlized: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zvxg-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-id-00 > > > Abstract: > The MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) identifiers document [RFC6370] > specifies an initial set of identifiers, including the local assigned > Z9-Tunnel_Num for co-routed bidirectional LSP, which is not covered > by the current specifications, like [RFC3209], [RFC3473]. This > document defines Resource ReserVation Protocol Traffic Engnieering > (RSVP-TE) identification of MPLS-TP co-routed bidirectional LSP. > > > Thanks and best regards > > ;) > > The authors > > > *Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>* > > 2012-10-09 02:11 > > > 收件人 > zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, > venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com, xuyunbin@mail.ritt.com.cn, > bao.xiao1@zte.com.cn, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)" <db3546@att.com> > 抄送 > > 主题 > Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: > draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-tunnel-num-04.txt > > > > > > > > > Fei, Authors, > I think you have the document scoped to match the > discussion. I'm > personally still having a hard time with parsing the document. I think > I know what you mean to say, it's just that the document isn't always so > clear. I think some editing might help. > > Hhere are some suggestions: > 1) Change the title to something like: > RSVP-TE Identification of MPLS-TP Co-Routed Bidirectional LSPs > > 2) Simplify the Abstract, perhaps just focus on the purpose of the > extension vs the details of the extension. > > 3) Ensure the Intro covers the key points clearly. I see the minimal > set of key points as: > - TP identifiers are defined in RFC6370 > - Identifiers are need by both end points of a bidirectional LSP > for OAM > - RFC6370 defines mapping of TP identifiers to RSVP-TE for > associated bidirectional LSPs (but other aspects aren't which > are covered by [associated-lsp]), but not co-routed LSPs. > - The high level approach taken by the draft to address the > missing function. > > 4) The Operation section seems to be covering procedures, so why not > just combine with section 4.2, or add an informational description of > the extension as part of section 4 (before section 4.1). > > 5) The Procedures section needs to explicitly define what an > implementation needs to do to (a) support the desired function and (b) > conform with the document. Think about covering what the > ingress/transit/egress needs to do and how it needs to do it. > > Lou > > PS please feel free to respond on-list (including the above) if you'd like. > > On 8/28/2012 12:33 PM, zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn wrote: >> >> Lou >> >> We have received comments offline/online and addressed them into the >> draft v-03 from the polling version 02, then updated the draft to v-04 >> according to the comments received since IETF84 meeting and pushed the >> proposal into the mailinglist also to hear more opinions. >> >> The authors think we have addressed all the comments and this draft is >> ready for WG consideration now. >> >> Any suggestion? >> >> Best regards :) >> >> Fei >> >> >> *Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>* >> >> 2012-08-21 01:38 >> >> >> 收件人 >> zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn >> 抄送 >> ccamp@ietf.org >> 主题 >> Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: >> draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-tunnel-num-04.txt >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Fei, >> To respond to your procedure point: >> >> On 8/17/2012 3:27 AM, zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn wrote: >>> I am not sure whether this draft should follow the the procedures >>> defined for WG documents or not. >> >> Individual drafts are completely under the control of the authors. Of >> course, they may choose to listen to feedback of WG participants in hope >> of getting their draft accepted as a WG draft.... >> >> Lou >> >> >
- [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsv… internet-drafts
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp… zhang.fei3