Re: [CCAMP] G.698.2 MIB concerns addressed by ITU-T colleagues

[Huub van Helvoort <[e-mail]>]

Hallo Rüdiger,

You wrote:

> Huub and Dieter mentioned during the CAMP session in London that ITU-T
> Q6 has some concerns about additional values in document.

It was indeed I who mentioned that. During conversations with Q6
experts I noticed that they have still concerns regarding the
use of an application code and adding additional parameters because
that defeats the intention to define and use application codes.

My intent was to suggest that you communicate with Q6 experts
either by attending Q6 meetings and submit contributions for
discussion, or write a liaison from CCAMP to Q6 asking for
their opinion regarding the drafts that were introduced in
the CCAMP meeting.

> Gabriele mentioned the reason for adding these values and we will update
> the documents with explaining text.

I was only the messenger, it would be better to communicate
directly with Q6 experts.

> During our common meeting with ITU-T at IETF 86 Pete Anslow mentioned:
 > Transmit power may be useful, beyond
> that I cannot think of anything else you may want to set.

IETF86 is already some time ago. You could have asked in the meantime
what Pete actually did mean by "may be useful".

> If you guys have still concerns lets discuss these points on the list.

Again: I am only the messenger, please talk to the Q6 experts
directly. FYI Q6 is meeting in the week of March 23.

Best regards, tschüss, Huub.




-- 
*****************************************************************
               请记住，你是独一无二的，就像其他每一个人一样