Re: [CCAMP] G.698.2 MIB concerns addressed by ITU-T colleagues

Huub van Helvoort <> Fri, 14 March 2014 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A47F1A0154 for <>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHVazf57fBAb for <>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EEC1A014F for <>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id hn9so596137wib.13 for <>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=orYmw3u1j2pYaNKwv5pRE9UrObowzfYIvzmEWOmFnO4=; b=IxINH1LwD2VxLL6KS4yqU8cFRcduuDQevIX1zf7ym3dcvIbTAfxghxai2SWYdA+KF3 UVwTCUNWQjQtrrPAFpj4WeDPMXBEhljf/odVHVX4Zv45OBs7tASagXN20bbHxvuDmlIr TqYI1FJcBe8l7irGjGeBvZqVtGaC3BlSrkSmM/Ld+LWx5jBLfeUXEM+4Wb850oMWZpto gkIGSt7ogxnZb2jl1c/r5FxOpaG98s6CtDpzyi6jyzgA1mZCyb6Ju5bHQaXA2hHQwHUK ej7JOE4J6UYyTq8QnfMIksaffGZxSNI3X6lSN7l30q2YSUxvsFd8hP0/wrMLrJokEELn J9hg==
X-Received: by with SMTP id fp18mr50612wjc.89.1394807237458; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local ( []) by with ESMTPSA id ju6sm14313652wjc.1.2014. for <> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:27:15 +0100
From: Huub van Helvoort <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] G.698.2 MIB concerns addressed by ITU-T colleagues
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:27:26 -0000

Hallo Rüdiger,

You wrote:

> Huub and Dieter mentioned during the CAMP session in London that ITU-T
> Q6 has some concerns about additional values in document.

It was indeed I who mentioned that. During conversations with Q6
experts I noticed that they have still concerns regarding the
use of an application code and adding additional parameters because
that defeats the intention to define and use application codes.

My intent was to suggest that you communicate with Q6 experts
either by attending Q6 meetings and submit contributions for
discussion, or write a liaison from CCAMP to Q6 asking for
their opinion regarding the drafts that were introduced in
the CCAMP meeting.

> Gabriele mentioned the reason for adding these values and we will update
> the documents with explaining text.

I was only the messenger, it would be better to communicate
directly with Q6 experts.

> During our common meeting with ITU-T at IETF 86 Pete Anslow mentioned:
 > Transmit power may be useful, beyond
> that I cannot think of anything else you may want to set.

IETF86 is already some time ago. You could have asked in the meantime
what Pete actually did mean by "may be useful".

> If you guys have still concerns lets discuss these points on the list.

Again: I am only the messenger, please talk to the Q6 experts
directly. FYI Q6 is meeting in the week of March 23.

Best regards, tschüss, Huub.