[CCAMP] G.698.2 MIB concerns addressed by ITU-T colleagues

<RKunze@telekom.de> Thu, 13 March 2014 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <RKunze@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406651A09C9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7OkaZ2HjwbL for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail33.telekom.de (tcmail33.telekom.de [80.149.113.247]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54A31A09B6 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.153]) by tcmail31.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 13 Mar 2014 15:36:36 +0100
Received: from HE113559.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.125.65.101) by HE101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.125.92.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.342.0; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:36:33 +0100
Received: from HE101451.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.147]) by HE113559.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:36:36 +0100
From: <RKunze@telekom.de>
To: <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:36:35 +0100
Thread-Topic: G.698.2 MIB concerns addressed by ITU-T colleagues
Thread-Index: Ac8+yaJXH8vwWfWRQbyQfVfsHVxr9A==
Message-ID: <D0A3A22C2D7BE64AA7506612C2E9BAB7015368006C1B@HE101451.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0A3A22C2D7BE64AA7506612C2E9BAB7015368006C1BHE101451eme_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/E9RJSK4-WwPXweKQITxRh2_F0N8
Subject: [CCAMP] G.698.2 MIB concerns addressed by ITU-T colleagues
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:36:47 -0000

Hi all,

Huub and Dieter mentioned during the CAMP session in London that ITU-T Q6 has some concerns about additional values in document.

Gabriele mentioned the reason for adding these values and we will update the documents with explaining text. During our common meeting with ITU-T at IETF  86 Pete Anslow mentioned: Transmit power may be useful, beyond that I cannot think of anything else you may want to set.

If you guys have still concerns lets discuss these points on the list.

Best regards

Ruediger