IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03581A0981 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0tSE89mbzR_J for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F71D1A0740 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6224; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1394712307; x=1395921907; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=tMjDxX0xZ/MfIBsU0cl7vQme/1VptOEjeguNdntLezs=; b=dYKPwcuaLnen/o4TZUc1VHep5NQjiy6AkohwmzKWr7mirrQuDHIiQYlN HlD1j+yRXrqdfHbwpQFYD4ONZiLWFSENVY3sSN5cfUmIxSkJV1fWDQvWi gcx8b355KulSn2EiHPO7+vh8RRZ6HEwQ/5ELqCsqkhnIRLO3tGLFp22Nu E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYFAEaeIVOtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABZgkJEO1e4dohrgRoWdIImAQEELUwQAgEIIiQyJQIEAQ0Nh3EN01gXjG+BGiMxB4MkgRQEmXeQe4Mtgis
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,647,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="27165454"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2014 12:05:06 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2DC56Rm028809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:05:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.141]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:05:05 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update
Thread-Index: AQHPMdsUeUbfUPnga02HbcjEE+t+vprfBFNw
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:05:04 +0000
Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC10861EA4@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTt-mZO4dTKc5_diQJPmttpX=wFC66X3u9U56oQso8iNMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTt-mZO4dTKc5_diQJPmttpX=wFC66X3u9U56oQso8iNMw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.245.88]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC10861EA4xmbrcdx03ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/zC3bxRCVJz6YFBQ971iTdPTQrew
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:05:16 -0000

Pavan, authors,

Something I wanted to ask in London when you presented but didn't get the chance to as we were short on time...

The draft as it stands talks only about 32-bit labels, but we're also considering longer ones (e.g. the flex-grid/super-channel work). Do you plan to define other wildcard labels in this draft? Or add wildcard labels to the drafts that define those new label formats? Or leave it for an entirely separate draft in future?

Cheers

Matt

Folks, Hi!

We recently published a new version of the "Network Assigned Upstream Label" draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-02). This new-version addresses all the comments that were raised against the version presented in Vancouver. Please read it through and let us know if there are any fresh comments.

Regards,
-Pavan (on behalf of the authors)
ps: Attached slideset (pdf) gives a quick overview of the draft

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email