Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Fri, 28 February 2014 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E281A01E9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:11:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ClLx16EqTDd for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:11:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671B41A0085 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:11:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail187-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.249) by TX2EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.9.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:59 +0000
Received: from mail187-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail187-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB442A0183; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -21
X-BigFish: VPS-21(zz98dI9371Ic85fhzz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzz1d7338h1de098h1033IL17326ah8275bhf14I8275dh18c673h1de097h186068hz2fh109h2a8h839hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh224fh1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1fe8h1ff5h20f0h2216h22d0h2336h2461h2487h24ach24d7h2516h2545h255eh25cch9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail187-tx2: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=jdrake@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(428001)(24454002)(377454003)(38605003)(199002)(189002)(74662001)(85852003)(76482001)(95666003)(19580395003)(83322001)(87936001)(79102001)(19580405001)(80022001)(80976001)(31966008)(87266001)(47446002)(63696002)(66066001)(2656002)(46102001)(94946001)(95416001)(51856001)(85306002)(83072002)(94316002)(54356001)(19300405004)(90146001)(76786001)(74502001)(49866001)(53806001)(69226001)(76576001)(56816005)(93136001)(47976001)(93516002)(47736001)(15975445006)(81342001)(81542001)(74316001)(33646001)(15202345003)(74366001)(74706001)(74876001)(86362001)(65816001)(54316002)(16236675002)(81686001)(50986001)(19609705001)(76796001)(4396001)(59766001)(77982001)(56776001)(81816001)(92566001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB771; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.241.10; FPR:EE34E2FD.CFF5FC2.B1F37DD7.48A551BD.20223; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail187-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail187-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1393593049368137_11651; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TX2EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.232]) by mail187-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5042260089; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by TX2EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (10.9.99.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:38 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB771.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.209.26) by BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.423.0; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:37 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by BLUPR05MB771.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.209.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.883.10; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:36 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.00.0888.003; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:36 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update
Thread-Index: AQHPMdsYvssPwUy7tE25OQyH3lHq5prFzY2AgAAgTQCABC0SgIAAghAAgAAHuQCAAALEIA==
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:10:35 +0000
Message-ID: <8456f073b7914ce383016978f1f170ce@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CA+YzgTuUQzfjnjTWdya7xgpytB+nBvY_d-Sx4faqUJY3Md9h5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CF323F23.9C8CD%zali@cisco.com> <CA+YzgTtxz-aQXx8d5EV0kP05DV9NCAdUdbAmV0pK7nECo+KvFw@mail.gmail.com> <9EF94792-38EE-4671-833A-D5FC1F7FFE3C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9EF94792-38EE-4671-833A-D5FC1F7FFE3C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-forefront-prvs: 0136C1DDA4
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8456f073b7914ce383016978f1f170ceBLUPR05MB562namprd05pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/cGJy8pvn26-V_qESLvsqqmvf-rk
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:11:05 -0000

Giovanni,

Use of acceptable doubles the signaling overhead and opens up a contention window:


1)      Path

2)      Path_err w/ acceptable label

3)      Contention window

4)      Path w/ acceptable label

5)      Resv

Versus:


1)      Path w/ downstream assigned label request

2)      Resv w/ downstream assigned label

Also, it's generally considered a bad idea(tm) to include error messages in the normal operation of a protocol

Yours Irrespectively,

John

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 4:54 AM
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update

Hi Vishnu,

On 28 Feb 2014, at 13:26, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> wrote:


(2) The use of Label-Set/Acceptable Label-Set was meant to be used for exceptions. Using it always for every setup request is a compromised solution.


At the time we discussed the wson signaling (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-06), the acceptable label set was considered good enough. Not sure it comes into play at every request since your label_set should have reasonably good labels.

Cheers
G