Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF

"Mohammad Siddiqui" <siddiqui_2000@hotmail.com> Sun, 10 March 2002 21:37 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:38:47 -0800
From: Mohammad Siddiqui <siddiqui_2000@hotmail.com>
To: tnadeau@cisco.com, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: sob@harvard.edu
Bcc:
Subject: Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:37:01 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <F232jvANHwORzbrWH0G0000d305@hotmail.com>

I second this and vote for 2.


>From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>CC: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
>Subject: Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF
>Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 12:28:19 -0500
>
>
>         I vote for 2.  Although I think there is room
>for input in the form of requirements/requests and such
>from the ITU, I think that having to interface with
>the ITU for this work is going to lead to interop
>problems as well as delay the work.  The IETF created the
>standards for MPLS and continues to evolve the technology,
>so it makes sense to me that we continue to create and evolve
>the standards for managing MPLS.
>
>         --Tom
>
>
>>Scott Bradner wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > 0/ you think I do not understand the issue
>> >
>> > 1/ split the tasks:  The IETF focus on the ping/traceroute mechanisms 
>>and
>> > cede to the ITU-T work on the more telco-like OAM.  In this option the 
>>IETF
>> > would publish draft-ohta-mpls-label-value-01.txt as an RFC and assign 
>>an
>> > MPLS reserved label value for use by the ITU-T to identify Y.1711
>> > information.
>> >
>> > 2/ The IETF work on a suite of technologies ranging from the
>> > ping/traceroute-like mechanisms to the more telephone system OAM ones.  
>>The
>> > IETF could try to figure out how to do this in conjunction with the 
>>ITU,
>> > though it is a bit late for that considering the state of Y.1711, or be 
>>in
>> > competition with the ITU-T.
>> >
>> > So - please indicate your opinion on how the IETF should proceed
>> >
>> > 1 - split the tasks between the IETF and the ITU-T
>> > 2 - IETF produce standards track documents covering both areas
>> >   2a - trying to work with the ITU-T to produce common technology
>> >   2b - in competition with the ITU-T
>> >
>> > In any case, it would be good to provide feedback to the ITU-T on 
>>Y.1711 if
>> > you see anything that looks broken.
>> >
>> > Scott (with sub-ip AD hat on)
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
>
>




_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.