Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF
"Mohammad Siddiqui" <siddiqui_2000@hotmail.com> Sun, 10 March 2002 21:37 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:38:47 -0800
From: Mohammad Siddiqui <siddiqui_2000@hotmail.com>
To: tnadeau@cisco.com, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: sob@harvard.edu
Bcc:
Subject: Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:37:01 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <F232jvANHwORzbrWH0G0000d305@hotmail.com>
I second this and vote for 2. >From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com> >To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org >CC: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu> >Subject: Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF >Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 12:28:19 -0500 > > > I vote for 2. Although I think there is room >for input in the form of requirements/requests and such >from the ITU, I think that having to interface with >the ITU for this work is going to lead to interop >problems as well as delay the work. The IETF created the >standards for MPLS and continues to evolve the technology, >so it makes sense to me that we continue to create and evolve >the standards for managing MPLS. > > --Tom > > >>Scott Bradner wrote: >> >> > >> > 0/ you think I do not understand the issue >> > >> > 1/ split the tasks: The IETF focus on the ping/traceroute mechanisms >>and >> > cede to the ITU-T work on the more telco-like OAM. In this option the >>IETF >> > would publish draft-ohta-mpls-label-value-01.txt as an RFC and assign >>an >> > MPLS reserved label value for use by the ITU-T to identify Y.1711 >> > information. >> > >> > 2/ The IETF work on a suite of technologies ranging from the >> > ping/traceroute-like mechanisms to the more telephone system OAM ones. >>The >> > IETF could try to figure out how to do this in conjunction with the >>ITU, >> > though it is a bit late for that considering the state of Y.1711, or be >>in >> > competition with the ITU-T. >> > >> > So - please indicate your opinion on how the IETF should proceed >> > >> > 1 - split the tasks between the IETF and the ITU-T >> > 2 - IETF produce standards track documents covering both areas >> > 2a - trying to work with the ITU-T to produce common technology >> > 2b - in competition with the ITU-T >> > >> > In any case, it would be good to provide feedback to the ITU-T on >>Y.1711 if >> > you see anything that looks broken. >> > >> > Scott (with sub-ip AD hat on) > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. > > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALASO
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF neil.2.harrison
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Vip Sharma
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Ping Pan
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Don Fedyk
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Mohammad Siddiqui
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Matt Squire
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Tom Petch
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Yutaka SAKAI
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Raj Sharma
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Randy Bush
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Scott Bradner
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Mina Azad
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF David Allan
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Shahram Davari
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Joel M. Halpern
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Shahram Davari
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Shahram Davari
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF John Drake
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Eric Rosen
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Giles Heron
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Gibson, Mark
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF neil.2.harrison
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF Giles Heron
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Igor Faynberg
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Scott Bradner
- Re: MPLS OAM & the IETF George Swallow
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF Shahram Davari
- RE: MPLS OAM & the IETF ananth.nagarajan
- MPLS OAM & the IETF Scott Bradner