IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: OSPF ASON Routing Solution

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 26 July 2006 14:03 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5jyb-00073H-JJ for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:03:05 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5jya-0001gW-A0 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:03:05 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1G5jpS-0001xM-Uc for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:53:38 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from [80.68.34.48] (helo=mail1.noc.data.net.uk) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1G5jpS-0001wv-A5 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:53:38 +0000
Received: from 57-99.dsl.data.net.uk ([80.68.57.99] helo=cortex.aria-networks.com) by mail1.noc.data.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1G5jpc-0004EV-00 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:53:48 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([217.158.132.199] RDNS failed) by cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:53:34 +0100
Message-ID: <021a01c6b0ba$df5e1b50$0a23fea9@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
References: <062701c6a5e6$e40805f0$e90ddb84@your029b8cecfe> <00c601c6ab40$7f534ca0$0a23fea9@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: Re: OSPF ASON Routing Solution
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:52:26 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2006 13:53:34.0649 (UTC) FILETIME=[E30F8A90:01C6B0BA]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336

Having seem some discussion of the mechanisms and debate about the details, 
but no objections, we will take this as a WG document.

Dimitri, please re-submit as draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-00.txt

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF ASON Routing Solution


> Just a refresh in case you were travelling.
>
> I am seeking objections to this draft becoming a WG document.
>
> Adrian
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:10 PM
> Subject: OSPF ASON Routing Solution
>
>
>> Hi,
>> On Monday in CCAMP we discussed 
>> draft-dimitri-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-00.txt the solutions draft 
>> for OSPF in ASON routing.
>>
>> There is agreement from the OSPF WG chair that we are not treading on 
>> toes, and the meeting seemed to say that this was pretty stable.
>>
>> So a this is a quick poll to see if anyone objects to this becoming a WG 
>> draft.
>> NB, this is a charter item and we have an obligation to work on this for 
>> the ITU-T.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>>
>> PS Note that a solution does not have to be 100% perfect to become a WG 
>> draft.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email