Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements between ICANN and IETF Trust

CW Mail <> Tue, 02 May 2017 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD1412EAD6 for <>; Tue, 2 May 2017 11:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVGPVY6ZuZPQ for <>; Tue, 2 May 2017 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ECD512EC2A for <>; Tue, 2 May 2017 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by paganini32 with id FWkU1v01508Vkuo01WkVUo; Tue, 02 May 2017 20:44:38 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: CW Mail <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 20:44:27 +0200
Cc: IETF Announcement List <>, CCG PTI <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <>
To: Trustees <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements between ICANN and IETF Trust
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 18:47:45 -0000

Good evening:

Thankyou Kaveh Ranjbar for this information. 
For the avoidance of doubt, may we please have confirmed that this is about Community Review of the amendments to Exhibit E that have already been approved by CCG?
In which case, which Community entities are being consulted and by whom? 
I understand that there are no additional or new amendments proposed in this text. Is that correct?

May I also suggest that IETF please cease to use .docx formats because they are incompatible with Open Office .odt
In this case in point, the text that is described as a 'markup' contains no edits, redlines or other markups.

(This is a longstanding feature of .docx I am not inventing anything!)


Christopher Wilkinson

On 02 May 2017, at 15:43, The IETF Trust <> wrote:

> All;
> We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust
> from ICANN using CSC as the registrar.
> The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the IANA IPR
> License Agreements’ Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements. 
> Exhibit E is the same in each of the three IANA IPR License
> Agreements between the Trust and ICANN, specifically the licenses
> for the IANA Names Services, the IANA Numbers Services and the IANA
> Protocol Parameter Services.
> The implementation of the domain name registrar requirements needed
> additional details than in the current Exhibit E. These details have
> been worked out with ICANN, reviewed by the CCG and approved by the
> IETF Trust for this review by the community.
> Specifically the proposed changes affect the following: under the
> circumstance where the Administrative and Technical Contacts must
> approve the change to the Technical Contact the Registrar must
> provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to change the
> Technical Contact.
> Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant (Trust)
> can override the need for the other parties to approve a change to
> the Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation
> that notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative
> and Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a
> period of no less than ten business days.
> These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where
> the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers, to prohibit
> deletions, and to remove the configuration to renew the domain
> automatically.
> A markup of the License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those proposed
> details and can be found here as Proposed Amendment to License
> Agreements 1 May 17:
> CSC has agreed that it can implement the proposed changes.
> It is believed the next steps are:
>  a.  Community Review
>  b.  Acceptance of proposed changes to Exhibit E by the Trust
>  c.  Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License 
> 	Agreements
>  d.  Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A
> 	(Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements)
>  e.  Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community 
> 	Review 
>  f.  Community Review
>  g.  Trust executes CSC Agreement
>  h.  CSC Test of conformance to the requirements 
>  i.  All IANA domains transferred upon successful test
> Your feedback by 17 May 2017 on the proposed amendments to Exhibit E
> of the IANA IPR License Agreements and the next steps are
> appreciated.
> Thanks.
> Kaveh Ranjbar
> Chair
> IETF Trust
> _______________________________________________
> CCG mailing list