Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22.txt

Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com> Tue, 09 November 2021 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <alficles@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687333A0E12 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 00:00:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eipNEn9TzUc9 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 00:00:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x933.google.com (mail-ua1-x933.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::933]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420273A0DC1 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 00:00:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x933.google.com with SMTP id p37so35726339uae.8 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3u9CvfHRCf57vItXiqs7G2V0K7Y1Fs3y2G/u2NqTRZk=; b=aSaB8Jnf37B1Byf1aYe9l4jMmUa/D3RKim0+s4VxMy1K8Hk+YZSnR+s+Vj6Xf/v2sy gFa/zCoisDbvN5BGYsMQfVxy58M6vlb5kM7XXzRD4EUQwJKvOrgLzEFzt4aATDmWRxwn y/kbJKmr9qLffNczT174ACen7qOwvgK/aHEuUaRLwrxKLUS3ayv9Udn+DGF22+/1wNgO u0OondLjz+GB3TqsLlRK1gVeXewWNWBz+pArIvuhjcRUpAAP26uKbIQfHcZKvXf0jPC+ fHk0FCTEznwdxq+CR+DBtsghgDV2FFwmP67gPys6njvvUhQk0ujmVxwSsvoe6Wc/xj9o qAxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3u9CvfHRCf57vItXiqs7G2V0K7Y1Fs3y2G/u2NqTRZk=; b=peNfIQN7N0huC3XFv86+BQg/TfaNSUNzQBrodeVc2W0h0CBAkmQkUi71Yauu5VRSre kzGEo/JfFr4krkXD1aOw/7GOgGNVthNVGdz1cY6iSd0DHOvXa58H7dHl1ghIMjQ7Jrhe IQgAfS953LzCU/kRMDNBtj85VhT7lFOcuA0ctw4poWs6Kxmig8lZujb0bgTUi2Q3I+yU FmRArALeCDf9HpITxZeiYF+AWNivPtxo8RS6ayHcT5qgWg94Y3kz/e+kduPJVTbjHnha z8DhKnKNdEzbJHz3sqvm5SqL3iVNflWCH07/7nPgXsGWQljKna6iE3btsvMA48/NdDpp 2LJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533AnNJq+cy/TkG+g+KfomkEmtaukYY1KqeOh4RjgoGgqeMYXbS4 GjQo9+YWfNr3QUl5XLiIHQvJuGAkLMGAqE9GQXk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyE2CNCUM7F77AUPyFJxlP5k0P5ECm7buEkkioQ5OYutdDIAeH2BNWJ1k+hcxcZmZZsB/0sv+Pyhocj7kk+5GA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:358b:: with SMTP id h11mr8579900vsu.24.1636444827432; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163520346940.2076.13669341839825557305@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMrHYE0tCc8idgi0-Fp+bcykW==Sv-FkqsqNmRMS19jgESqj8g@mail.gmail.com> <CABF6JR1UvFsBTS4EpUnGJ=Frxdvb=PSDqu9BHY9R=RPH3ZPh=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABF6JR1UvFsBTS4EpUnGJ=Frxdvb=PSDqu9BHY9R=RPH3ZPh=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 01:00:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJEGKNtajKcuPtHOSdGZXQzTsi4jM50+CDr3GM8vGH=p5Ehg3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Cc: Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>, "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/A9LNSx8_k4FIuc5CyNfrnsBVYLc>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22.txt
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:00:41 -0000

Fixes for nits, regrettably also including the same ones you just
fixed in 69: https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/70

Updates that I _think_ fix the weird figure text? I'm not certain this
is the best way to do it, but the existing way looks odd. Look at the
diff linked earlier and check out the figure titles.
https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/71

The much-belated text I promised a while back on 6570:
https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/72

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 7:55 PM Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/69
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 10:02 PM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>>   Thanks for getting the updated draft out.  A couple typos/nits:
>>
>>   - section 2.1.10: "for example in" -> "for example, in"
>>   - section 3.2.1: "MAY bt" -> "MAY be"
>>   - section 4: "after and access" -> "after an access"
>>   - section 4.4: remove "against the key issuer with"
>>   - section 5.2: "Sigbned" -> "Signed"
>>
>> --  Kevin J. Ma
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 7:12 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Content Delivery Networks Interconnection WG of the IETF.
>>>
>>>         Title           : URI Signing for Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI)
>>>         Authors         : Ray van Brandenburg
>>>                           Kent Leung
>>>                           Phil Sorber
>>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22.txt
>>>         Pages           : 42
>>>         Date            : 2021-10-25
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>    This document describes how the concept of URI Signing supports the
>>>    content access control requirements of Content Delivery Network
>>>    Interconnection (CDNI) and proposes a URI Signing method as a JSON
>>>    Web Token (JWT) profile.
>>>
>>>    The proposed URI Signing method specifies the information needed to
>>>    be included in the URI to transmit the signed JWT, as well as the
>>>    claims needed by the signed JWT to authorize a User Agent (UA).  The
>>>    mechanism described can be used both in CDNI and single Content
>>>    Delivery Network (CDN) scenarios.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing/
>>>
>>> There is also an htmlized version available at:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22
>>>
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CDNi mailing list
>>> CDNi@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni