Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22.txt

Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> Tue, 09 November 2021 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sorber@apache.org>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54F73A081C for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:47:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOZye3_Eqg9M for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout1-he-de.apache.org (mxout1-he-de.apache.org [IPv6:2a01:4f9:c010:567c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6022C3A081F for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.apache.org (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mxout1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mxout1-he-de.apache.org) with SMTP id E57446119C for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 41051 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2021 15:46:58 -0000
Received: from ec2-52-204-25-47.compute-1.amazonaws.com (HELO mailrelay1-ec2-va.apache.org) (52.204.25.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:46:58 +0000
Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) by mailrelay1-ec2-va.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-ec2-va.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 5B7553EA1C for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id u1so33761204wru.13 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 07:46:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GlGPSnVkKHzXDRzYGWrRY4loOOgyjE2anafQC9OSYfiZZpn7K 5QOY9BoG3BQ+XnPeJ0ae/D6Y1JgCOHBEy3xUPgY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/wS8wn2yrvuYIwYbWkqakJ71Luioo6F9hEi1ztbPapNVplFLCChDolaf5rYSRW1XhdTXX61gk8LSaDkB6mJM=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe88:: with SMTP id l8mr10852463wrr.208.1636472817466; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 07:46:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163520346940.2076.13669341839825557305@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMrHYE0tCc8idgi0-Fp+bcykW==Sv-FkqsqNmRMS19jgESqj8g@mail.gmail.com> <CABF6JR1UvFsBTS4EpUnGJ=Frxdvb=PSDqu9BHY9R=RPH3ZPh=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJEGKNtajKcuPtHOSdGZXQzTsi4jM50+CDr3GM8vGH=p5Ehg3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJEGKNtajKcuPtHOSdGZXQzTsi4jM50+CDr3GM8vGH=p5Ehg3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:46:46 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABF6JR3R_eOXWJzE_45nkZY+VE6qy7urpr0AigjR1hZQOPBFyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABF6JR3R_eOXWJzE_45nkZY+VE6qy7urpr0AigjR1hZQOPBFyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>, "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8417405d05d04db"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/VD-QQb_F2W_g_6-agYBpltJPY0M>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22.txt
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:47:19 -0000

Thanks, I merged two of these, but I think we should have a little more
time to think on #72 before we merge it, just because it's been so debated
and I don't want to keep changing it.

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:01 AM Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fixes for nits, regrettably also including the same ones you just
> fixed in 69: https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/70
>
> Updates that I _think_ fix the weird figure text? I'm not certain this
> is the best way to do it, but the existing way looks odd. Look at the
> diff linked earlier and check out the figure titles.
> https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/71
>
> The much-belated text I promised a while back on 6570:
> https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/72
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 7:55 PM Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/PSUdaemon/URISigningSpec/pull/69
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 10:02 PM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Phil,
> >>
> >>   Thanks for getting the updated draft out.  A couple typos/nits:
> >>
> >>   - section 2.1.10: "for example in" -> "for example, in"
> >>   - section 3.2.1: "MAY bt" -> "MAY be"
> >>   - section 4: "after and access" -> "after an access"
> >>   - section 4.4: remove "against the key issuer with"
> >>   - section 5.2: "Sigbned" -> "Signed"
> >>
> >> --  Kevin J. Ma
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 7:12 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >>> This draft is a work item of the Content Delivery Networks
> Interconnection WG of the IETF.
> >>>
> >>>         Title           : URI Signing for Content Delivery Network
> Interconnection (CDNI)
> >>>         Authors         : Ray van Brandenburg
> >>>                           Kent Leung
> >>>                           Phil Sorber
> >>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22.txt
> >>>         Pages           : 42
> >>>         Date            : 2021-10-25
> >>>
> >>> Abstract:
> >>>    This document describes how the concept of URI Signing supports the
> >>>    content access control requirements of Content Delivery Network
> >>>    Interconnection (CDNI) and proposes a URI Signing method as a JSON
> >>>    Web Token (JWT) profile.
> >>>
> >>>    The proposed URI Signing method specifies the information needed to
> >>>    be included in the URI to transmit the signed JWT, as well as the
> >>>    claims needed by the signed JWT to authorize a User Agent (UA).  The
> >>>    mechanism described can be used both in CDNI and single Content
> >>>    Delivery Network (CDN) scenarios.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing/
> >>>
> >>> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22
> >>>
> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-22
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> CDNi mailing list
> >>> CDNi@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CDNi mailing list
> > CDNi@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>