IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] namespace considerations for ebml's definition of EBML Schema

Moritz Bunkus <mo@bunkus.online> Fri, 17 July 2020 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mo@bunkus.online>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A5E3A1586 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bunkus.online
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yBWA4ffrwDst for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from liselle.bunkus.org (liselle.bunkus.org [144.76.140.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9034D3A1584 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adara.bunkus.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:1d01::feed:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by liselle.bunkus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B86C100808 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:48:40 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bunkus.online; s=mail2019123101; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:In-reply-to:Subject:To:From:References; bh=Ev7ED6icZvYwXMmySdi/ERFK97idy78gYQSBbubBBSA=; b=bvDM2nNOSivj4sUd9bwk24FrEAxCOa0cc9lOCF7gZ5NwBWiajARSwtwxvDA4uZn+PnJwQ8G6AcoceBnzBIoLW61Lqs3YNRTXvQHRGNF88s8feQ8+B0IhHhyZ8PH0upnmg87GX+rGcolFNtE40KrcYcz2ddSdpMX0tH5Rmbg215yFmJiXunvotVk967/Zbi4AuMrMf6mxTlfDhMhkqCYuekKrQc0f7fRPeM7ioOp0hDbAeb4sc7o5KBfOAlJNEg+cWvDGJ84//70jW/N2acRnHF4ZOpAMTMuE/gtMvci2Ppr6JfYAqmD1lRTgIUYABahcb3vymlb2wWG1yX2G2B1luQ==;
Received: from liselle.bunkus.org ([2a01:4f8:200:144f::105:1]:34100) by adara.bunkus.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <mo@bunkus.online>) id 1jwM2f-0000gI-1j for cellar@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:48:29 +0200
Received: from sweet-chili.int.bunkus.org (unknown [10.55.5.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by liselle.bunkus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F1021007FA for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:48:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sweet-chili (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sweet-chili.int.bunkus.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BF830875F2 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:48:29 +0200 (CEST)
References: <3E54D46B-6D44-4095-9A5A-D9FB7CDB0F90@dericed.com> <CAOXsMFJpVN+uDkqcNFync2+Zt5j2hUVu1-3AawreA1mYQNeBkA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3
From: Moritz Bunkus <mo@bunkus.online>
To: cellar@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CAOXsMFJpVN+uDkqcNFync2+Zt5j2hUVu1-3AawreA1mYQNeBkA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87pn8ujzmr.fsf@bunkus.online>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:48:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/8So33NQqcfAXhAb56LLNH5S7o_4>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] namespace considerations for ebml's definition of EBML Schema
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:48:45 -0000

Hey,

I agree with Reto; the URL provides more information to the user than a
urn. Personally I wouldn't want to point it to the draft website. The
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8794 site, even though it doesn't exist yet,
seems to be the one providing the most useful information. So let's use
that one.

Kind regards,
mosu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email