Re: [Cellar] namespace considerations for ebml's definition of EBML Schema

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 17 July 2020 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0A03A03FF for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdGCRE85OmiL for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4043A03FC for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0F0389A8; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:01:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uZvRfQgvQcli; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:01:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4BC389A5; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:01:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EA21CB; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:04:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Moritz Bunkus <mo@bunkus.online>
cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, cellar@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87lfjijh50.fsf@bunkus.online>
References: <3E54D46B-6D44-4095-9A5A-D9FB7CDB0F90@dericed.com> <CAOXsMFJpVN+uDkqcNFync2+Zt5j2hUVu1-3AawreA1mYQNeBkA@mail.gmail.com> <87pn8ujzmr.fsf@bunkus.online> <19827.1594999191@localhost> <87lfjijh50.fsf@bunkus.online>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:04:44 -0400
Message-ID: <21892.1595019884@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/h2WZg0QF-_AQwpWOQV2l88fhy2I>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] namespace considerations for ebml's definition of EBML Schema
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 21:04:50 -0000

Moritz Bunkus <mo@bunkus.online> wrote:
    > I defer to experience (as I don't have any in assigning namespaces). If you
    > think that URN urn:ietf:rfc:8794 is the way to go, that's fine with me.

I think it would be the least controversial, but I definitely do like the
idea that someone following the URL would get pointed at useful
documentation.

I'm hoping Adam will know, or will know what the best practice is here.

This is something that has to go into the ebml document, which is just
waiting for Dave Rice's okay in AUTH48, right?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-