Re: [Cellar] IRC channel again

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 08 June 2021 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75963A0D01 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HB_aAmkfrdXo for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF62F3A0CFF for <cellar@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id b13so32520924ybk.4 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8XtGSYJfBwA+WgqfxehNCbVFP4j8zMe3k7BIq0nbLqk=; b=NcWH7Ddg/ZX9sio3zpPQfoPyauJML+sdOoVRvnDAa/Ym2I0MmW4TGJ+Y6r/uhPkXyM 6zZCNfy/lle0qiApJaeJdJom0kRTXcoXBh928sva4daWZiqQOasHOt8Y8LglXaECFgvs WQ7PsqP21aOeB1fHEIsVFNmFm/65ObExByVrUuTT7HVXvNfd+JlKxw1dBdU5O8FmeBWn VPoJ82o5o0Acsmo0LeQeM3HEIb6aUmlPSL7HZ1B33hHPJIdOEJ+7Je8CJDCRm98L65Pe PcFLfT6sgt0j50LS0vBhw2owI+fdcKBrZD2deLdxP744HoW7F1RcqJDGZyWyMP7cleDs IYTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8XtGSYJfBwA+WgqfxehNCbVFP4j8zMe3k7BIq0nbLqk=; b=kwkyYvMNRqfZsvx58QBcHbJlMA7wViRA0cuILBxum+4tmwNbtI2F3Bdx6WTJzo9//z 0LcZRkUiGR1cIEbo2kPw+MV5gMDVPgUivxQBzcGh50G7G7+xWnN67RrR4wY4q94iYH93 nCeWNWen/LA+CVeg8TFnMeP1T7pNDctDmVukoCWZ/3+DaYGTbaD4JL58ocxaJj2kIfBQ o3tiSRyHJ5HMlTiUL79gcqSuIuJfUnwfWQvzfrQlYS+CupsirYyXBLIuDaeE92LEW7eu hIbL8O+ULUOX0+wGh37JNGaNDdncxXDOWgynAa56DedpqyWQplekx69ewMF3AZJQd5pC lPqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V5W1+iiPasu9fu0rDibs1X0iJfri9XN4IUhDWUULqRSFs8OXo +htN1LgNlIhSqCQYLU/CwrZZPv9Apfetu36MWGfXcipaVtBTsA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6hjFMpPJ1Hxef1dxUZ8RKs/uJ54hyrMOFYBh+dqz5nJxFzkVAzLyd8XV03v4LCQmk3eOQmcdXCHVQERqeF9w=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:86cf:: with SMTP id y15mr35570988ybm.389.1623191973082; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87tumnrwz6.fsf@bunkus.online> <f037b0c6-f357-f4c0-ab8e-0ce4b81d833c@matroska.org>
In-Reply-To: <f037b0c6-f357-f4c0-ab8e-0ce4b81d833c@matroska.org>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 17:39:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-dg_KCufHDXhvkF=m=86f_exBKQHm5Y48B9UCcr08-FsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org>
Cc: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f53bb705c448d456"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/PMXcJ6MONcuoErQXhtpUhwXts7g>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] IRC channel again
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 22:39:40 -0000

Just to follow up on this ...

On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 1:42 AM Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org> wrote:

> On 2021-05-28 12:09, Moritz Bunkus wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > yeah, we talked about the IRC channel on Tuesday and decided to postpone
> > the decision (or not to do anything at that point). Mostly people didn't
> > have a strong opinion one way or the other.
> >
> > Over the last couple of days Freenode has cracked down on several hundred
> > channels, simply due to them having "libera.chat" in the topic. Not just
> on
> > channels that actually planned to move, but also on channels that were
> > simply thinking about moving or that did NOT in fact wanted to move and
> > told their users via their topic.
> >
> > Cracking down means that a Freenode bot came in, renamed the channel,
> > removed rights from existing ops, changed the topic and basically
> archived
> > the channel. They're seizing control of channels they have nothing to do
> > with.
> >
> > Here are a couple of examples:
> >
> >
> https://www.gentoo.org/news/2021/05/26/gentoo-freenode-channels-hijacked.html
> > https://mastodon.sdf.org/@kline/106299403921451814
> >
> https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/05/26/announcing-ubuntus-move-to-libera-chat/
> >
> > I find all of this highly offensive to a community of free/open source
> > projects.
> >
> > Therefore I do have a strong opinion now: let's move our IRC to
> > libera.chat, please.
> >
> > As all of you didn't have a strong opinion on Tuesday, I'll assume you're
> > OK with that move. Unless someone objects by Sunday, I'll implement the
> > move on Monday (closing the channel on Freenode, updating our web page).
>
> I support the move. This has become ridiculous. AFAIK Videolan is also
> moving there.
>
> > Switching to other chat tools (XMPP/Jabber, Matrix…) is a totally
> different
> > topic I'm not trying to tackle at this point; moving IRC is easy enough
> to
> > implement and somewhat time sensitive due to recent events.
>

We talked about this move at the last monthly meeting, and I'm not hearing
objections, but this is something that the IETF wouldn't have an opinion
about. We don't need to talk about it on our next agenda, do we?

We'll let Moritz Do The RIght Thing, whatever that is ...

Best,

Spencer