[CFRG] Re: RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits

[Loganaden Velvindron <[e-mail]>]

I agree. Let's move forward.



On Sat, 11 Jul 2026, 02:39 Eric Rescorla, <[e-mail]> wrote:

> This document is clear and useful and I believe CFRG should publish it.
>
> I have not double checked the formulae, but as I understand it, the
> authors have done so and solicited sufficient external review.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 8:12 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear CFRG,
>>
>> We haven't received any comments during this RGLC extension.
>>
>> Please comment if you have read the document, especially the most recent
>> version draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-11.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Stanislav (for chairs)
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:33 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear CFRG,
>>>
>>> The authors of draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits have addressed the concerns
>>> raised during the RGLC (see
>>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-09&url2=draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-11&difftype=--html
>>> ).
>>>
>>> We didn't finish the RGLC last time, so we are now formally extending
>>> the RGLC: it will end on February 28th.
>>>
>>> We got a review of the draft from Thomas Pornin (on behalf of the Crypto
>>> Review Panel):
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/AKkf4W6n_JgDlvHlOdQphb932jQ/
>>> The comments were addressed in version -09 of the draft.
>>>
>>> If you've read the document and think that it is ready (or not ready)
>>> for publication as an RFC, please send a message in reply to this email or
>>> directly to CFRG chairs ([e-mail]) If you have detailed
>>> comments, these would also be very helpful at this point.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 2:52 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear CFRG participants,
>>>>
>>>> This message is starting a 3-week RGLC on
>>>> draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-09 ("Usage Limits on AEAD Algorithms") that
>>>> will end on February 3rd 2025. If you've read the document and think that
>>>> it is ready (or not ready) for publication as an RFC, please send a message
>>>> in reply to this email or directly to CFRG chairs ([e-mail])
>>>> If you have detailed comments, these would also be very helpful at this
>>>> point.
>>>>
>>>> We've got a review of the draft from Thomas Pornin (on behalf of the
>>>> Crypto Review Panel):
>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/AKkf4W6n_JgDlvHlOdQphb932jQ/
>>>> The comments were addressed in version -09 of the draft.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Stanislav, for CFRG chairs
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> CFRG mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>