Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02

[Alyssa Rowan <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 10/01/2014 19:11, Watson Ladd wrote:

> Added: explicit formulas and a point format (big endian with a bit
> for the missing coordinate).

Fair enough. (Cofactors were also added, by the way.)

> The name is now the Chicago curves.

As good as any other.

Comments:
• Typo in end of section one: Weierstrass, not Weierstrauss.
• I think it'd be a little more helpful if section 2 were split into
  two sections: the Montgomery curves, and the Edwards curves. That'd
  make it much more apparent which curves are applicable to which
  sections in 3 and 4.
• Pretty please can we have Curve1174 as well?

Other than that, no more comments.

E-521's passed all tests, by the way, as expected (and it seems was
obviously rigid enough that three groups actually came up with the
exact same curve!).

I see no particular reason to hold this up.

- -- 
/akr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=PsP0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----