IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06

John Wilkinson <wilkjohn@gmail.com> Wed, 12 October 2005 20:46 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EPnUU-0006gs-KG; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:46:22 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EPnUT-0006gi-HD for cfrg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:46:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04412 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:46:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from qproxy.gmail.com ([72.14.204.199]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EPneq-0004eC-28 for cfrg@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:57:05 -0400
Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id e11so33497qbe for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=mQVfTT/VPuM/g34WLfhdqe9tnjxNgyK+KeW89Jf00WGTVq/W6rcFZROa4sSumOYe6vkPsh+3vidVVRzhnWefgS5zcI2/WAeSX+OANUnhmW3PvS9fZbeuFT1516PFiFkvfoBD6jrjUrqGssc9vdUKOZcyXK/t1RQi+6kB0vYEUaI=
Received: by 10.65.186.17 with SMTP id n17mr23337qbp; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.0.1.2? ( [68.160.142.158]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e19sm4187425qba.2005.10.11.16.28.44; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734)
In-Reply-To: <200510111827.j9BIRf8A029440@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <200510111827.j9BIRf8A029440@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <117346BB-7E3B-41C2-8D5F-0C389CE47925@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Wilkinson <wilkjohn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:28:41 -0400
To: cfrg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: cfrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: cfrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: cfrg-bounces@ietf.org

I agree with David's assessment of the new draft, and I would second  
his proposal. -John

On Oct 11, 2005, at 2:27 PM, David Wagner wrote:

> David McGrew writes:
>
>> the UMAC authors have submitted a revised version of their draft,
>> which is now available at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-
>> krovetz-umac-06.txt.  They have also posted a proof of security
>> online at http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/umac/
>>
>
> I think this draft is excellent.  I would propose that it be advanced
> to RFC status.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>


_______________________________________________
Cfrg mailing list
Cfrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email