Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06

canetti <canetti@watson.ibm.com> Mon, 17 October 2005 03:09 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERLN2-0003Vb-VN; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:09:04 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERLN1-0003VS-Eg for cfrg@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:09:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA10740 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:08:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from igw2.watson.ibm.com ([129.34.20.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERLYG-0005n2-CN for cfrg@ietf.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:20:40 -0400
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [129.34.20.41]) by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.1/8.13.1-2005-04-25 igw) with ESMTP id j9H3AfK9015372; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:10:41 -0400
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.7/01-14-2004_2) with ESMTP id j9H38oF12002; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:08:50 -0400
Received: from mgsmtp00.watson.ibm.com (mgsmtp00.watson.ibm.com [9.2.40.58]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.7/01-14-2004_1) with ESMTP id j9H38n412000; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:08:49 -0400
Received: from prf.watson.ibm.com (prf.watson.ibm.com [9.2.16.112]) by mgsmtp00.watson.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/2005/09/01) with ESMTP id j9H36jV1028979; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:06:45 -0400
Received: from localhost (canetti@localhost) by prf.watson.ibm.com (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0/03-06-2002) with ESMTP id j9H38nD26922; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:08:49 -0400
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:08:49 -0400
From: canetti <canetti@watson.ibm.com>
To: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] UMAC draft version 06
In-Reply-To: <B39E8F40-1CEF-4605-BFE7-A409F7C65A75@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.58.0510162303420.72182@prf.watson.ibm.com>
References: <B39E8F40-1CEF-4605-BFE7-A409F7C65A75@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: cfrg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: cfrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: cfrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: cfrg-bounces@ietf.org

Folks,

We'd like to set a formal deadline for comments on this draft, that will
allow the authors to make it before the upcoming cutoff date even if some
additional small issues will come up. So let's set this Wednesday the 19th
as the deadline.

Thanks,

David and Ran


On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, David McGrew wrote:

> Hello,
>
> the UMAC authors have submitted a revised version of their draft,
> which is now available at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-
> krovetz-umac-06.txt.  They have also posted a proof of security
> online at http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/umac/ (please note that
> the Internet Draft referenced at that site is expired - you want to
> read version 06).  Thanks to Ted and the other authors for revising
> the draft and providing the additional material requested.
>
> There has been contention on some technical points, so your review of
> the new version and comments on these topics will be appreciated.
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>

_______________________________________________
Cfrg mailing list
Cfrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg