Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz (Peter Gutmann) Fri, 16 August 2002 04:11 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA25864 for <cfrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:11:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id AAA28653 for cfrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:13:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA28630; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA28600 for <cfrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:12:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hermes.cs.auckland.ac.nz (hermes.cs.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.35.151]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA25852 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:10:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ruru.cs.auckland.ac.nz (ruru-nfs.cs.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.35.12]) by hermes.cs.auckland.ac.nz (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7G4BS8W001869; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:11:28 +1200
Received: (from pgut001@localhost) by ruru.cs.auckland.ac.nz (8.9.3/8.8.6/cs-slave) id QAA18674; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:11:28 +1200 (NZST) (sender pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:11:28 +1200
Message-ID: <200208160411.QAA18674@ruru.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
To: cfrg@ietf.org, rhousley@rsasecurity.com
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt
Sender: cfrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: cfrg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: cfrg@ietf.org
"Housley, Russ" <rhousley@rsasecurity.com> writes: >IEEE 802.11 has chosen to make CCM the mandatory to implement AES mode for >wireless LAN encryption. IEEE 802.15 has also chosen CCM for use with >personal area networks. In my opinion, this success is due to the lack of >a patent (or pending patent from the authors) on CCM. I suspect that most >of the members of this list are aware that other candidate authenticated >encryption modes are encumbered. Is there a chance that it'd be covered by some other patent? Having recently looked at DH+password mechanisms, I'm wary of algorithms in fields where multiple overlapping patents already exist. >It is my intention to publish draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt as an >Informational RFC. This looks like the appropriate group to review the >document. If it's truly unencumbered, I'd like to see this as standards-track. I've been working on an single-pass encrypt+MAC process draft for CMS for use in areas like EDI, but a combined mode of operation would be much nicer. Peter. _______________________________________________ Cfrg mailing list Cfrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
- [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Housley, Russ
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Greg Rose
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Housley, Russ
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Greg Rose
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Housley, Russ
- RE: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt David A. Mcgrew
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Gé Weijers
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Gé Weijers
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Uri Blumenthal
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Housley, Russ
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Carl Ellison
- [Cfrg] Re: draft-housley-ccm-mode-00.txt Housley, Russ