IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 04 February 2016 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700BD1ACDBB for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:07:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8O-f9mrnfg3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DF11ACD9F for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B954E1304; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:07:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5844E1302; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:07:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1454612823; bh=Ekrz64jSLlpquDzFZIbuUV65XZh/pZBL9nNcA6FoIKI=; l=276; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GWtjI4HRIwCPkr/ZrzTcUes1hzp623oMj1Kayz0jzIplW5SU808ZWS6wMX0zQinkx ilaS404AkoVc+7sYE8333ssDlvNaD3t1qs458UTXvMh514U/XJhf78T6qHXDw5l/XP I1UhUMzrWwosj3UGlwFzr1aUsDRmyvyNi7oFCZDU=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ecp.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690E32049; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:07:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:07:02 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:07:02 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik
Thread-Index: AQHRXp1bReohjMsPikuAasQVb3Hr758cdsaAgAAcYYD//63kwA==
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:07:02 +0000
Message-ID: <ff3c1ab0eaa94bc497001720b8dd5351@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <4A631584-C0F1-4AFC-A51D-155C34415413@isode.com> <D2D64C5B.61B8F%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <CADqLbz+b-YQ10d6d5_GHN+r7ETWobQgq+skPyXQSdUGG1dBDqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=ErkJLja7QUbA06V7vH-KPR_MpTcPhPyrKfyV02bxq-w@mail.gmail.com> <D2D65F65.266E2%uri@ll.mit.edu> <87a8nix2od.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <D2D68F83.26762%uri@ll.mit.edu> <871t8uw0sb.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <D2D78DD6.2680E%uri@ll.mit.edu> <b0a5edfea0df3670d5526d488dc731d1.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0c=OcJP6jzne9hHp67U6ZVpBssK1y=4zu1UW8+V=brUF0w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=OcJP6jzne9hHp67U6ZVpBssK1y=4zu1UW8+V=brUF0w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.34.64]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/R5SAI_m2zyDDDbbQPCSeMw7RaBM>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:07:06 -0000

> We got very badly bitten by making experimental RFCs for MD5 and RC4.

Travel back in time to when this happened.  What alternatives where there?

We got good use out of those two mechanisms.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email