Re: [Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 02 February 2016 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C701B2EBD for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:28:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.803
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.803 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sm55VfNdo5nC for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91AD1B2EB9 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9628433420; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:27:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B396E433414; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:27:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1454437678; bh=eJP2ZKyFY9JnQYzeK+CSStpvM+p9QTmzKwsehgDJZsM=; l=210; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sceG45+gsCtGzCBVxEpajSJKpK/ZLWRbv/kpH+AGAspjxh9Czjwh4xAPWjIZ4MTFd 0AB59t57hkTqqyydUFrJG1Eib06Jb6uaji4e9MBJ0pV3Y66s6W3ZYSel/EvcVC897s f3R6TElVukiBw+O/jb0qyFofhgBpruWvWjS2lVw0=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-casadmn.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF00F2050; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:27:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:27:58 -0800
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:27:57 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik
Thread-Index: AQHRXas3a+GUx2aJ402N2LTKEdkYpp8Y7/+AgAB2RYD//60KYA==
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 18:27:57 +0000
Message-ID: <7ab42c507df34a4da7f0be051e69661c@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <4A631584-C0F1-4AFC-A51D-155C34415413@isode.com> <D2D64C5B.61B8F%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <CADqLbz+b-YQ10d6d5_GHN+r7ETWobQgq+skPyXQSdUGG1dBDqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=ErkJLja7QUbA06V7vH-KPR_MpTcPhPyrKfyV02bxq-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=ErkJLja7QUbA06V7vH-KPR_MpTcPhPyrKfyV02bxq-w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.193]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ai1ZBvUbY2Ne5KuFOUWnXrPC5Zo>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, ISE <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 18:28:01 -0000

Why is there no design document comparable to that for Rijndael?

Perhaps because it wasn't trying to win a global contest for a new crypto standard?