IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 30 January 2016 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28E71A896D for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:35:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIdrvEuW18wS for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:35:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5261A896B for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:35:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1454186136; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=c8vjAlFe8qW/Ag/bfY5ctlcn9CHC3WiELoke7GibVOY=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=g9XnCyuRUv9noVoN/NjI9dBKaJU+AsEcHPRDrZ4z5PmUwb139bjqA1UaYxXNntGjgNd6iR yNrGdQTkahU0Abiy2PjbXdsIolRA/xfyzrW10E8/tJNmWIFZTyB/DZyvRigVgfmpb+D2pX EY9OClE9SkGFGdF89qZtwHKD1Q3jrv4=;
Received: from [192.168.0.51] ((unknown) [79.135.41.74]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <Vq0elgAbMIkF@waldorf.isode.com>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 20:35:35 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS PIPELINING
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 20:39:41 +0000
Message-Id: <4A631584-C0F1-4AFC-A51D-155C34415413@isode.com>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13D15)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-3BBC3DF3-DB94-401C-91B7-FB53DD011CC7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/d63gZied3kHuytVHLtEkGSIBKfA>
Cc: Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [Cfrg] RFC 5742 conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 20:35:39 -0000

Dear CFRG participants,

On February 4th the IESG will be doing the conflict review for a draft [1] that describes GOST R 34.12-2015: Block Cipher "Kuznyechik". Stephen Farrell is handling this document on behalf of IESG. Stephen asked for feedback from CFRG.

Since national algorithms are typically documented as independent submission stream RFCs, I think this one does not represent a conflict with ongoing IETF work or process. If you disagree, please let Stephen and CFRG chairs know.

Should someone want code points for using this algorithm in IETF protocols, that would of course go through the normal IETF consensus process. See RFC 5742 [2] for details of what this bit of process is about.

If you have comments on the draft content then please send those to the authors and cc the independent submissions editor, Nevil Brownlee (rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org).

Best Regards,
Alexey, on behalf of CFRG chairs.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik/
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5742

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email