Re: [Cfrg] Enough already!

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 27 January 2015 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6491A8902 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:51:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmZO1cFMu3EU for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D481A88F1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-91.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.7) with ESMTPSA id t0RHprL1006104 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:51:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-98-91.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.91] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <607a42362766a5cd5952255513ec65e8.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:51:53 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6B6BAC11-7A8A-44C5-A875-95E9555B275B@vpnc.org>
References: <CACsn0c=Mx9rWwQpGmK9gDH0bDRTVWtspy_D1=pJ3QHTdRrs8XA@mail.gmail.com> <607a42362766a5cd5952255513ec65e8.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ZkqlwEYqPxlFNWqjX-EceodV1Zg>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Enough already!
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:51:56 -0000

On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> wrote:
>  Apparently your naiveté has finally been confronted with reality. Last
> year I told you it would take something like 2 years to get an RFC published.
> You said no, it should only take 30 minutes. This is how sausage gets
> made.

Oh, please. This is only how sausage gets made badly. Other groups, when asked to say what is and is not secure, don't stop and lecture people about how we used to do it.

--Paul Hoffman