IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CGA-EXT] New Version for draft-krishnan-csi-proxy-send-00

"Jean-Michel Combes" <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com> Fri, 27 June 2008 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cga-ext-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-cga-ext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6AF3A68E8; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1190E3A68DD for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qaJkCuvj2Gm7 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EF23A68E8 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so521008rvf.49 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VpalqDo4uOzsvzqwwEcS34DJQZf0cosOsj490DAeOdc=; b=lpY/2u2j33pbc57JuSM3G48Q7Gl75RqNjx36pMPGvGSzSvKlepO9LNVxj9clhkFt35 evVXbfMDWEEM49JgaMFX0+01RTWadtI/edXVTmSKVADlEycRcitbuNPbkZDHQOci1F8Z kSQ196KAIYxRXoHXv7AzXNDyrVkXeP9hC/5tg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ennJHgufaR38CZ/OZzkNBYm62rAZqjc4JuPTAfPBO26TW4PXNw1u25Z5N3Yc1fOKI3 XFp59bvFmCviS7jKBZb5IdJNwiIah4G95fcaRCmXg9RwHMybF9uMBQzOSJCi6BNRzHPh pdEWl7k7hs/HfEGg//7jJdDzzWozClpMy1VkI=
Received: by 10.141.49.18 with SMTP id b18mr1006983rvk.92.1214592132398; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.189.15 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <729b68be0806271142h5e33644ei42b01e404c760710@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:42:12 +0200
From: Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <485AD60E.7070806@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <729b68be0806061730y7bf7f8e7ld3d2b2a5de4155f5@mail.gmail.com> <200806121653.22293.julien.IETF@laposte.net> <729b68be0806181102n12449c7ahe631c725a5ce3ad1@mail.gmail.com> <485950F5.9020107@ericsson.com> <729b68be0806181414q2b8cdc17vd37b6fee1aa83892@mail.gmail.com> <485AD60E.7070806@ericsson.com>
Cc: cga-ext@ietf.org, Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net>
Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] New Version for draft-krishnan-csi-proxy-send-00
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: cga-ext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Suresh,

I had a private exchange last week with Julien about my comments and
now I have no more issues with your proposal :)

Cheers.

JMC.

2008/6/19 Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>:
> Hi Jean-Michel,
>
> Jean-Michel Combes wrote:
>>
>> Hi Suresh,
>>
>> Sorry but some points are unclear for me.
>>
>> At first, what are assumptions you have regarding the MN?
>> From my point of view, the MN is able to use SEND: in using either CGA
>> or a cert linked to its address. Is it the same assumption for you
>> because I am not sure this is the case? :)
>
> Yes. I am working under the same assumption as you :-).
>
>>
>> Second point, if the MN have a CGA, how does the ND Proxy get the cert
>> which will allow it to sign the NDP signaling instead of the MN?
>
> I think I am beginning to understand your issue. One thing I would like to
> point out is that the ND proxy gets the authority to do this not from the MN
> being proxied but from some other entity that is trusted by the receiving
> MN.
>
>>
>> Last point, if the MN have a cert linked to its address, how does this
>> cert is provided to the MN?
>
> This is out of scope of this document. The document does not talk about
> certificates for end nodes.
>
> Cheers
> Suresh
>
>
_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing list
CGA-EXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email