IETF Logo Mail Archive

Consensus Check - SDLC Objects for RS-232 MIB

Bob Stewart <rlstewart@xap.xyplex.com> Thu, 03 March 1994 15:35 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04607; 3 Mar 94 10:35 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04603; 3 Mar 94 10:35 EST
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09101; 3 Mar 94 10:35 EST
Received: from xap.xyplex.com by hubbub.cisco.com with SMTP id AA04404 (8.6.4/IDA-1.5 for <snadlcmib@cisco.com>); Thu, 3 Mar 1994 07:20:38 -0800
Received: by xap.xyplex.com id <AA28766@xap.xyplex.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 94 10:25:51 -0500
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 1994 10:25:51 -0500
Message-Id: <9403031525.AA28766@xap.xyplex.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@xap.xyplex.com>
To: char-mib@pa.dec.com, snadlcmib@cisco.com
Subject: Consensus Check - SDLC Objects for RS-232 MIB

A few people spoke in favor of adding some SDLC-related objects to the RS-232
MIB.  They were reposted just recently by Wayne Clark, SNA SDLC MIB editor.
They could be added as a separate compliance group for SDLC, but I didn't do
so due to the general apathy.  The following test of consensus is intended to
insite response.  Depending on the response, I may try the other way around.

******** Consensus Test *********

Are there strong objections to leaving out the proposed SDLC objects?

	Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email