Re: Comments on draft-ietf-charmib-rs232-mib-00.txt
Bob Stewart <rlstewart@xap.xyplex.com> Thu, 03 March 1994 15:42 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04712; 3 Mar 94 10:42 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04707; 3 Mar 94 10:41 EST
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09195; 3 Mar 94 10:41 EST
Received: from xap.xyplex.com by hubbub.cisco.com with SMTP id AA04280 (8.6.4/IDA-1.5 for <snadlcmib@cisco.com>); Thu, 3 Mar 1994 07:15:32 -0800
Received: by xap.xyplex.com id <AA28711@xap.xyplex.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 94 10:20:45 -0500
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 1994 10:20:45 -0500
Message-Id: <9403031520.AA28711@xap.xyplex.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@xap.xyplex.com>
To: char-mib@pa.dec.com, snadlcmib@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: wclark@cisco.com's message of Wed, 02 Mar 94 15:54:17 PST <199403022354.AA04396@hubbub.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-charmib-rs232-mib-00.txt
I'll take full responsibility for leaving out the SDLC objects. I considered putting them in, then waffled, based on little support for them. In the general quiet, I certainly may have misread the silent interest. Let me try the email consensus test that worked well for SNMPv2. I'll see if I can shake supporters loose. Bob