WG ACTION: Chassis MIB (chassis) to conclude
Dan Romascanu <dan@lannet.com> Wed, 21 July 1993 15:03 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03978; 21 Jul 93 11:03 EDT
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03972; 21 Jul 93 11:03 EDT
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA00838; Wed, 21 Jul 93 10:43:53 -0400
X-Resent-To: chassismib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Wed, 21 Jul 1993 10:43:52 EDT
Errors-To: owner-chassismib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from aristo.tau.ac.il by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA00829; Wed, 21 Jul 93 10:43:48 -0400
Received: from gandalf.lannet.com ([192.114.33.2]) by aristo.tau.ac.il with SMTP id AA05103 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <chassismib@cs.utk.edu>); Wed, 21 Jul 1993 17:42:45 +0300
Received: from moon.lannet.com by gandalf.lannet.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04197; Wed, 21 Jul 93 17:45:21 IDT
Received: from gandalf.lannet.com by moon.lannet.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25025; Wed, 21 Jul 93 17:46:39 IDT
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1993 17:46:39 -0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dan Romascanu <dan@lannet.com>
Message-Id: <9307211446.AA25025@moon.lannet.com>
To: chassismib@cs.utk.edu
Subject: WG ACTION: Chassis MIB (chassis) to conclude
Hi everybody, Joseph Zur writes: Hi all, I read the last two messages from Bob Stewart and from the IESG Secretary and somehow I feel that it is not the case of "we can't do it", but rather, "we don't want to do it". After waiting for the chassis MIB for more then a year I don't want to wait another year for it. I call upon the AD and the IESG to reactivate this working group before 1994. I personally believe that a call for vote on one of the drafts published will show that there is more of a consensus than pepole think. I call upon the working group members who want to see this MIB become a standard to express this "loud and clear" on the mailing list so that the AD and the IESG see that public opinion is not in favour of their decision. --- Joseph Zur LOUD AND CLEAR: We do want this MIB to become a standard. But, as Marshal wrote in his last message concerning this subject, it seems that the WG is procedurally dead. In Amsterdam, an open meeting of the NM Area Directorate was held. A moratorium on new WGs was declared untill the end of 1993, 'due to lack of senior technical resources'. This would mean that in order to have the process of standardisation revived, we should not only clearly articulate our wish in this direction, but also have somebody consequently assuming the task of chairing this effort. I do not think that we lack the resources on this regard. According to what I heard in Amsterdam, I am not optimistic upon the chances of reversing this decision before the end of 1993. There might be an apeal procedure, but I bet you would rather use the time in building an implementation than in finding out how to use the apeal procedure. Dan Romascanu, LANNET Data Communications Ltd., Tel Aviv, ISRAEL, Voice: 972-3-6458-414 Fax: 972-3-5447-146
- Re: WG ACTION: Chassis MIB (chassis) to conclude Joseph Zur
- WG ACTION: Chassis MIB (chassis) to conclude Dan Romascanu
- Re: WG ACTION: Chassis MIB (chassis) to conclude IETF Area Director for Network Management