Re: [cin] Next Steps

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 08 August 2012 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: cin@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cin@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3333921F85DB for <cin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 06:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1T5Xo1Xh+Yf for <cin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 06:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B9021F85D7 for <cin@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 06:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAMphIlCHCzI1/2dsb2JhbAA7CrlcgQeCIAEBAQEBAgEBAQ8eCg8lAxQEAgEIDQEDBAEBAQoGDAsBBgEmHwkIAQEEARIIARmHawudMJ1DixIQhXBgA5tHihGCYQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,733,1336363200"; d="scan'208";a="360873696"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2012 08:57:18 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2012 08:41:26 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:01:25 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407EB9E19@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <0D8F655B-8E3B-4DE6-8CD3-0EC9818C4A16@standardstrack.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [cin] Next Steps
Thread-Index: Ac1zOr7v0usAI5fUTsGMYfJTVfsBSwCKrSUA
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D7716530FC@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <0D8F655B-8E3B-4DE6-8CD3-0EC9818C4A16@standardstrack.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "Eric Burger" <eburger@standardstrack.com>, <cin@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [cin] Next Steps
X-BeenThere: cin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <cin.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cin>, <mailto:cin-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cin>
List-Post: <mailto:cin@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cin-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cin>, <mailto:cin-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:01:35 -0000

For medical devices communication and interoperability see
http://www.openecg.net/WS1_slides/S3_2_norgall/S3_norgall.pdf . ISO/IEEE
11073 seems to be the dominant family of standards for Point-of-Care
Medical Device Communications, based on IEEE 1073. 

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cin-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cin-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Eric Burger
> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 9:47 PM
> To: cin@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [cin] Next Steps
> 
> Part of this process is identifying other bodies working on this or
> similar topics.  The goal is positive, in that it identifies potential
> partners for the work.  The goal is also negative, in that we may find
> better venues than the IETF to do the work.  It is much better for us
to
> identify those groups that are in this space and explain either why
they
> will be a partner or are not relevant to our work.
> 
> I can help get the overall process done, but I don't know the space
well
> enough to list what's out there. Clearly there is input and
interaction
> with ICAO, FERC, and FDA for the aerospace, smart grid, and medical
> devices fields respectively. I am sure there are organizations out
> there, like IEEE for medical devices, NIST for FERC, and possibly the
> Aerospace Industries Association for aerospace.
> 
> Can someone step up, at least one from each of the target use cases,
to
> enumerate those related groups?
> 
> There is a lot more stuff to do, but the problem statement that Terry
> Davis and Bob Moskowitz are working on and this list of the ecosystem
> are what we need right now.
> 
> 
> On Aug 5, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> 
> > Folks,
> >
> > At the Bar BoF, several participants expressed interest in holding a
> real BoF in Atlanta. If this is still the intent, I recommend that the
> group:
> >
> > - read RFC 5434: Considerations for Having a Successful Birds-of-a-
> Feather (BOF) Session
> > - Ensure that the steps described in Section 2 of that draft have
been
> executed (or at least considered)
> > - Articulate the problem statement (preferably in an Internet Draft)
> > - Discuss the problem statement on this mailing list
> >
> > There will be many requests for BoFs in Atlanta. Your odds of
getting
> a BoF greatly improve if you follow the process described in 5434.
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Ron Bonica
> > vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cin mailing list
> > cin@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cin