IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-signaling-11

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 24 August 2017 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3941320CF for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z--l7taBauGq for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A49124207 for <clue@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7OJLnHd001360 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:21:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>, "Rob Hansen (rohanse2)" <rohanse2@cisco.com>, "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>
References: <0b69d2f1-11e1-8fd1-d4a1-2faacc0a8528@nostrum.com> <d4cfe8e14c7c40f0963f5d3e65fd17f9@XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD7FF837@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <9639e320-026d-57ed-4666-bdb3245309fd@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:21:44 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD7FF837@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/anULNCBwkZXKrnFWixWWrq0_4yw>
Subject: Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-signaling-11
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 19:21:58 -0000

On 8/24/17 07:53, Roni Even wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> Read your response looks good to me and agree with your analysis
> As for section 4.5.4.3 I think that section 6 of the protocol with the state machine is the right reference
> Roni
>

I don't see anything in section 6 of -protocol (or the state machine it 
contains) dealing with "media preservation" or "state preservation" in 
the face of CLUE protocol negotiation failures or errors. I agree that 
this would be a good place to discuss such things, but right now, it 
appears to be left ambiguous whether (e.g.) a CLUE setup failure has any 
impact on the media.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email