Re: Comments anyone

[Christian Huitema <[e-mail]>]

>On the topic of non-standards track, could the paper
>document the practice of having the IESG do technical review and
>annotation of informational and experimental rfc submissions?
>This is one of the really time-consuming and substantive
>aspects of working on the IESG.  We try to have it make
>a difference.

Mixed feelings. Mentioning review sort of reinforce the "standard status";
mentioning the "status of this memo" section, i.e. the result of the
review, might be more useful.

>How about sending the paper to IEEE Communications or
>Spectrum so that a lot of less Internet oriented people read it?

Good idea.

Christian Huitema