IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Sun, 29 April 2012 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7813921F84B4 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.646, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oCaG9pxxNvaU for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm-mail03.mozilla.org (dm-mail03.mozilla.org [63.245.208.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A443D21F84B2 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.0.5] (c-69-181-137-38.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [69.181.137.38]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by dm-mail03.mozilla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324424AEE3B for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F9D7073.5050303@xiph.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:46:43 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20120113 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: codec@ietf.org
References: <20120426202056.15659.50524.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F99B829.8020400@digium.com> <970F145F-628A-43C3-92A4-B6600D0B083D@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <970F145F-628A-43C3-92A4-B6600D0B083D@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:46:45 -0000

Cullen Jennings wrote:
> One suggestion on it ... I suspect it would be easier to get both the RTP
 > payload and storage format done quicker if they were separate into 
two drafts.
 > Clearly the payload needs to be done in PAYLOAD WG but folks might 
want to
 > ping the RAI and APPS ADs about where it makes sense to do the 
storage format
 > - might want to consider Apps for that.

This makes a lot of sense. For the storage format, RFC 3533 (Ogg) was 
done in transport, IIRC. But Apps might be better. Should we be 
targeting standards-track or informational for it?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email