Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard

Yes, we should get draft-spittka-payload-rtp-opus-00 moving. 

One suggestion on it ... I suspect it would be easier to get both the RTP payload and storage format done quicker if they were separate into two drafts. Clearly the payload needs to be done in PAYLOAD WG but folks might want to ping the RAI and APPS ADs about where it makes sense to do the storage format - might want to consider Apps for that. 

On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

> On 04/26/2012 03:20 PM, The IESG wrote:
>> 
>> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Wideband Audio Codec WG
>> (codec) to consider the following document:
>> - 'Definition of the Opus Audio Codec'
>>   <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt>  as a Proposed Standard
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-05-10. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Now that this draft has reached IETF LC, is it time to resurrect the expired draft-spittka-payload-rtp-opus-00 and get it heading towards publication by the PAYLOAD WG as well?
> 
> -- 
> Kevin P. Fleming
> Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
> Jabber: kfleming@digium.com | SIP: kpfleming@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec