[codec] Next Steps for WG
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 13 January 2011 22:25 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0C43A6C01 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:25:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HMEpBCTpxLlV for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B473A6BFE for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AskFAEALL02rRN+K/2dsb2JhbACWOY4Uc6QJmDWFTASEaIYogyI
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2011 22:27:44 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.2] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0DMRhZc011499 for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:27:43 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:29:19 -0700
Message-Id: <6963A8AD-F30C-4688-909A-68D4FEAF91C2@cisco.com>
To: codec@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [codec] Next Steps for WG
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:25:21 -0000
The OPUS draft authors believe the bitstream for OPUS will be ready to be "frozen" by the end of the month. At that point we plan to spend the following month testing and, baring any surprises, will likely go to WGLC after that. There has been some questions about what "frozen" means in IETF context. The bitstream could change any time up to when the IESG approves it which is after Working Group Last call and after IETF Last Call so there is no guarantee that nothing will change but ... by "frozen" we mean that we believe no changes are needed and don't plan to make changes unless some significant problem is found. Thanks, Cullen, Jonathan, and Mike
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Roman Shpount
- [codec] Next Steps for WG Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Colin Perkins
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] Next Steps for WG Koen Vos