IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] #3: 2.2. Conferencing: Support of binaural audio?

"Slava Borilin" <Borilin@spiritdsp.com> Tue, 23 March 2010 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <Borilin@spiritdsp.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A62F3A6C87 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.131
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4X1gksSymhy9 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.spiritcorp.com (mail3.spiritcorp.com [85.13.194.167]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66353A686C for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-srv.spiritcorp.com (mail-srv.spiritcorp.com [192.168.125.3]) by mail3.spiritcorp.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2NHradV034711; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:53:36 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from Borilin@spiritdsp.com)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:53:32 +0300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Message-ID: <5A3D7E7076F5DF42990A8C164308F810547717@mail-srv.spiritcorp.com>
In-Reply-To: <062.a837f2ff7647f7cb184f0c86b7e65747@tools.ietf.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [codec] #3: 2.2. Conferencing: Support of binaural audio?
Thread-Index: AcrKrvuIACd3YdARQgWZAA5s7Y3ufgAAmG9w
References: <062.a837f2ff7647f7cb184f0c86b7e65747@tools.ietf.org>
From: Slava Borilin <Borilin@spiritdsp.com>
To: trac@localhost.amsl.com, hoene@uni-tuebingen.de
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 192.168.125.15
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] #3: 2.2. Conferencing: Support of binaural audio?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:53:42 -0000

I agree 100% that the conference should be stereo, however, I am not sure that CODEC should solve еры positioning task.
There are other ways like sending the spatial position toward the client and let the client-side to the positioning job.
(remember, that in today's conference, like H.264SVC, assume that each participant MAY HAVE DIFFERENT LAYOUT of participants on the screen, therefore, spatial position can be different for different listeners).
So its not probably wise to mix in stereo on the server...

Slava Borilin


-----Original Message-----
From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of codec issue tracker
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:33 PM
To: hoene@uni-tuebingen.de
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: [codec] #3: 2.2. Conferencing: Support of binaural audio?

#3: 2.2.  Conferencing: Support of binaural audio?
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hoene@…                 |       Owner:     
     Type:  enhancement             |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major                   |   Milestone:     
Component:  requirements            |     Version:     
 Severity:  -                       |    Keywords:     
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 The mono mixing in teleconferences is somewhat technically outdated. It
 would make more sense to state the requirements for stereo mixing, which
 greatly helps to quality of teleconferencing.
 Then, if participants are placed at particular positions, they can be
 identified and understood much better, especially if multiple persons
 speak at the same time.

 Thus, I would suggest to give the low complexity mono mixing a low
 priority and the stereo mixing a higher priority.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/3>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>

_______________________________________________
codec mailing list
codec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email