Re: [Coin] COIN activities update

"Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: coin@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coin@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0073A1049 for <coin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rsng_WFxM7Q5 for <coin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRA01-MR2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr90112.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.9.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691463A1048 for <coin@irtf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MYLU/OjtUPzZ9zPKY/WewGk1jfpWAgSokQT2EgHj0L16W+BuTIw6F+Mr4deQYgTXr2YlMx8dcZ9q3AMarE5yMYC8Jrn/v+DubV7bPlUmXNUAjj0pNNRQCxCBaoTzWP0CnleUToM8N9WTzF7bA78XJhwQzFztN3neNTVscZ6fRvzv5gWd8A2wGt99+RqwNRDUxmUMcoX83Tx1Ceq6IDYR90IEDY5Un+SEW4f7dPKhFLMXs0s4NoT8yQmfCdZmaYaI9ekWPm6HcCVdlYLV06mb9xm+dQ7GHHmEeMvq5pQ4BQlQZArp8gwyAMlYdSxAI1X70+5JjODH7u4C2ileg/HneQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=iwjb1qCkqrOns2tVDT2TlT0SUA46qmDUiouzeYKN3M8=; b=HrTzyUU5TKZnEjk27qC/Tpuz7NdBzkAjay/wkE7ugjyws0LvWVhIH5TGYCkkMWDt7Y4+NGjqRoykvj4MdrPvua9MGnalcdUfXIQGTrR4BF4ZSmre5BrSLzRHSXZJbfLOtkM9ACcWw04Avv2Rs3x8CqH9OguC9ZE3j+TqGwGiJbkiSJN0O/Mw1CRAhQ4SJ6FlsNXFW0YqMwxYJOygqIPWpepIBKGvaxoV8yrgRc641PoBgRxZYE3PeSwHFN3EFM+uHFaqboWIKr0dK2UH/leOOsqSQaT0sKGQ4827DC+eOz+DrzDXYaWuKBr9daExTU7YXMPruKpNNUw+GdxbnwzL0Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=iwjb1qCkqrOns2tVDT2TlT0SUA46qmDUiouzeYKN3M8=; b=kcgCRabt0TWRkOlOJIO1IX7EWOGO52pJtJBC+EZ72BgchKGSY09yUSjZ+NFy39l1he+p+VKSCTO4twWPge6hG//JcBooWKVXU80Dga60j1Rs0LeRoDRfrpVmzvHxYetmMl1UcLuDHTdQbYOLPidJmvbY4cSbM0V7Fiok+YqMXzA=
Received: from PR3PR07MB6826.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:7f::20) by PR1PR07MB5097.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:1::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.9; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:02:37 +0000
Received: from PR3PR07MB6826.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::35a8:7108:9413:951e]) by PR3PR07MB6826.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::35a8:7108:9413:951e%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.019; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:02:37 +0000
From: "Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
To: Xavier de Foy <x.defoy.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>, "coin@irtf.org" <coin@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Coin] COIN activities update
Thread-Index: AQHWgSpe5F2tEcyctUWucmJFaxgOdqmqk1wAgAJlsAA=
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:02:37 +0000
Message-ID: <PR3PR07MB682651D187EF8790EE010A2DF3170@PR3PR07MB6826.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAPjWiCTXPc4uDBjcBpbnX7ruuDf_tnt3mo=uzpPOL5Z9PZVUQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHYjOTb_KLy0zU+TFBivvFueNFZ=-X_24jH=Hb_MZta8Sp91YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHYjOTb_KLy0zU+TFBivvFueNFZ=-X_24jH=Hb_MZta8Sp91YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [91.171.237.229]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: efba32da-aa23-4cfb-372c-08d87b17d610
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PR1PR07MB5097:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PR1PR07MB5097B7346925C3418868AA72F3170@PR1PR07MB5097.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: qFBnfUS6jLZwH+fys48apV6CfPgihpbXq5k4CA4iUgXfA5b0/rM/VLk/FwAA8tUMTUvgcCTyeho3I9/zDyL/IXD3YxvLI7s9JkU3c8/ZHoanZBe7WpZZMkK84kINDCxdyKTlWEGp2PEN4XL8vUJEPZjIn0CshDz/hoQPHqBUkUn22ritWKO2uaKYU+5vm5us6EWzpn1Uws1hG+It15p1wLsB0x01pw5zGKa6baB/yo9pF5T+v7QT5Zyf6UocaL+zHoqoE/0pBRTNgbL7k31vGAeZl7yX9SNCFfWw+Ruqd/ql1IaoojSKAAmOjmIQgGStevwyvudYVmjKlANZhtOr2fkm+cIEeD884YfnoES3DdVqXRbvupGjo/fpVhOVDMA6tETauWfAkNrL8Ox2I44bAA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PR3PR07MB6826.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(2906002)(66556008)(64756008)(66476007)(54906003)(55016002)(4326008)(53546011)(86362001)(186003)(5660300002)(8676002)(6506007)(26005)(33656002)(316002)(478600001)(8936002)(52536014)(15650500001)(76116006)(9686003)(66446008)(71200400001)(83380400001)(7696005)(966005)(166002)(6916009)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_PR3PR07MB682651D187EF8790EE010A2DF3170PR3PR07MB6826eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PR3PR07MB6826.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: efba32da-aa23-4cfb-372c-08d87b17d610
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Oct 2020 08:02:37.7541 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: FT/KoM+RUGQf1DUwRKUuldkcnpSCCYQzMsNGWdt+gM+SKWu/Ae/e8hN8jk4Zrnn91SE2OnuMBi39MCtFU50+/CZiW2CV/U5ROVOundcV0ac=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PR1PR07MB5097
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/coin/tDDO1gw9BbhgaR5haDdKJT5Nd1s>
Subject: Re: [Coin] COIN activities update
X-BeenThere: coin@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "COIN: Computing in the Network" <coin.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/coin>, <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/coin/>
List-Post: <mailto:coin@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/coin>, <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:02:43 -0000

Hi Xavier, all,

Apologies if my comments are out of scope as I'm not so up-to-date with the status of COIN technical work / terminology.

I think the examples you gave makes sense and could be useful to clarify of how various operations/flows could work.

Two comments:

  1.  What strikes me when reading the text is the reference to "COIN node" and "COIN network". Are these really necessary/useful terms?
I mean, I could map the examples you describe (partially or fully) to different existing technologies/operations. I find that adding the "COIN stuff" may shift the focus away from the genuine technical problem to solve by giving a false impression that the "COIN xyz" are sketching a different case. Reading your examples without the COIN-related terms, the sentences are still very valid. So, I guess the technical problem/solution to address is situated at another level, i.e. what is not working as you expect it or what would like to enable (in a COIN-like framework) that would be (solved) differently. I think this should be the core/focus of the examples.


  1.  COIN being a RG, I would advise to carefully position the below examples wrt. state of the art, and outline what/where the proposal is proposing new (research) things. Again, on the examples, most, if not all of the pieces/functions could be mapped to existing technologies/protocols. Can we pinpoint more specifically the technical propositions of COIN in these contexts?

Please don't take my comments negatively, I'm just trying to get to the core of the issues here; and I think COIN has good potential to deliver compelling research.

Best regards,
Laurent

From: Coin <coin-bounces@irtf.org> On Behalf Of Xavier de Foy
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 20:05
To: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
Cc: coinrg-chairs@irtf.org; coin@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Coin] COIN activities update

Hi Marie-José, all,

  On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:09 AM Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com<mailto:marie@mjmontpetit.com>> wrote:
> And of course there is the discovery draft has also been going though a number of revisions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcbride-edge-data-discovery-overview/:
> which raised the discussion topic of “in-network” vs. “on-network” and we suppose the reach of computing in the network, a great discussion topic to prepare for our next meetings and milestone updates. There are now 3 discovery draft and we welcome a discussion on maybe consolidating them.

  Thanks for initiating the discussion. In the hope of contributing to it, here is a set of simplified discovery scenarios (at least as a starting point, please feel free to update it). I think drafts [1][2] cover scenarios (a) and (b), and [3] covers (d). A goal is to frame the discovery scenarios in the context of COIN.

  The scenarios involve a "COIN network" (which, based my understanding of the charter, would be made of distributed/decentralized "COIN nodes" providing a computing service integrated with network/transport layers), and endpoints (non-COIN nodes, e.g. COIN network users or external data sources).

  a. A COIN node discovers a data source (COIN node or endpoint), for the purpose of influencing COIN network operation (e.g. code placement, request routing, input for computation). Data discovery information may be further disseminated between COIN nodes. In a related scenario a COIN node discovers an external network function (e.g. SFC node), for the purpose of using the service, influencing request routing, and placing the code that uses the service.

  b. A COIN node discovers computing/storage resources, for the purpose of creating/instantiating new COIN nodes.

  c. A COIN node discovers another COIN node (that belongs to a different domain), for the purpose of interfacing 2 different COIN networks.

  d. An endpoint or COIN node (which can be multihomed) discovers a COIN network entry point, for the purpose of connecting to it (e.g., as a user, or to join a COIN network). As a variant for wireless devices, mobile endpoints may need to determine which AP to attach to, in order to access a COIN network entry point.

  To come back to the consolidation discussion, would the RG community be willing to work on a document covering all or some scenarios listed here?

  Best Regards,

Xavier.

[1] draft-mcbride-edge-data-discovery-overview
[2] draft-mcbride-data-discovery-problem-statement
[3] draft-defoy-coinrg-mobile-discovery