IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Coin] Minutes of the interim meeting and some words from thecochairs

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Wed, 09 March 2022 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: coin@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coin@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96CC3A0B6A for <coin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:32:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id affwpkz-b831 for <coin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03B9B3A0B64 for <coin@irtf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:32:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=hMjM6BTcYaQGCWcAIlb8esyGZ8AwhfsMkypuL7psL10=; b=R3aHgABqOfkY6BmGkUOQpl7xrr pIxenksLwB/zheXnCC0MRFh2Lf2ZgzK5JixW/Gw8UBgcNJm5ziuIaM3dxpaPTH4qDB+VHnKd3gCDj aGHdFXFIaTrlFYqDl4LFRoueJSJwewcU1/0tDbxF8RZEk7ALqG0D2d12CL4bAyhoNramuV3Rr/9zi dtKj00F9NsT5ztXn8DrxZ0YEn+JQP2AytN8iNKU4Tye6zySbwaHR1qION6v/BeVq6dzNySiq4vao+ 71bO/3LFqgRnXMPnJ9FDglCbJqM6GoD2oW4kGi0KAyLJB95e+Lj540gEOZU6B+wPtbUVZhfZV2r9w 3h71E/9g==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=47728 helo=[192.168.0.67]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1nS231-0003eM-CI; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 19:32:39 +0000
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <D69D8A05-DC9C-48B3-AAF5-8DD0CC1C737E@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BA4E7123-42EF-46A5-851E-4CDA9D9B9ABF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 19:32:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <Yijmpqp7hk8A/L5/@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Eve Schooler <eve.m.schooler@intel.com>, coin <coin@irtf.org>, JEF <jefhe@foxmail.com>, coinrg-chairs <coinrg-chairs@ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <tencent_877D4D58E350C28439106A9CDF6FAAC4400A@qq.com> <SN6PR11MB31506AC8BBCDB6DF9395A196D70A9@SN6PR11MB3150.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <EAC330CD-85E3-4764-9EE2-7247C20F7A53@getnexar.com> <Yijmpqp7hk8A/L5/@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 14
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/coin/NcV3-PRc4Zrw3xV5s15Kpk48b5w>
Subject: Re: [Coin] Minutes of the interim meeting and some words from thecochairs
X-BeenThere: coin@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "COIN: Computing in the Network" <coin.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/coin>, <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/coin/>
List-Post: <mailto:coin@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/coin>, <mailto:coin-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 19:32:53 -0000

> On 9 Mar 2022, at 17:40, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> Sharon:
> 
> Given Colins ask to the folks like Adrian focussing on semantic addressing to first go to coin, i think any such problems should maybe start using COIN at least as a dispatch, and either the discussion about a specific topic

No – that is not correct.

What I said to Adrian was that some parts of the semantic routing work fall into the scope of COINRG, some parts overlap with other IRTF groups, and some parts are outside the scope of IRTF or are better suited to other venues. 

COINRG is not a DISPATCH-style group. Work that does not relate to computation in the network research is out of scope and should be discussed elsewhere.

> a) fits coin and might result in adopted work
> b) does not fit coin but subsides
> c) does not fit coin, does not subside and should then be moved
>   to another forum in IETF/IRTF or at least be given a mailing list.

If the work does not fit within the COINRG charter, it should not be raised here. 

Colin






-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email