IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [coman] Device Classes?

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Mon, 07 April 2014 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D121A0679 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.885
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id di0Cipr2iDCB for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591721A02CC for <coman@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl (roundcube1.xs4all.net [194.109.20.195]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s376cXZb010450; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:38:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stokcons@xs4all.nl)
Received: from a82-95-140-48.adsl.xs4all.nl ([82.95.140.48]) by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:38:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:38:33 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, coman@ietf.org
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <20140404130409.GB81513@elstar.local>
References: <533BBFB7.2000100@gmx.net> <893C4FAC-437D-4140-9832-A9ABA2D1518A@tzi.org> <533E75A9.5080003@gmx.net> <8D653B3C-E678-4A66-9798-978950977694@tzi.org> <533E9864.4060806@gmx.net> <EBDEF2B4-32C3-4B41-9CAF-C1A836CC6D7B@tzi.org> <533E9B6B.1080602@gmx.net> <20140404130409.GB81513@elstar.local>
Message-ID: <dadf99156baec90a0588ad19e4b8fc53@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (dj4RI8RGTKVizx5x+wwqssRs45CeExRl)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/coman/RnFCCm0Kq8lrIqAGQiO0TTfeR0o
Subject: Re: [coman] Device Classes?
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman/>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 06:38:47 -0000

> It would be really nice if we would all have a common understanding of
> what roughly the code and storage requirements of the various
> protocols involved are. Is LWIG producing something a kind of a survey
> like this? If so, this would be great I think.
> 
> /js

+1
Peter van der Stok

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email