[conex] Abstract marking and encoding in IPv6

Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Fri, 12 November 2010 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: conex@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C49A3A68B6 for <conex@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:29:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OymaeJIQ7TTG for <conex@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:29:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBD03A67EE for <conex@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b54ae000003464-27-4cdc987cd200
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DC.91.13412.C789CDC4; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:29:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSCMS0366.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.86]) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se ([10.2.3.116]) with mapi; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:29:32 +0100
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: "conex@ietf.org" <conex@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:29:08 +0100
Thread-Topic: Abstract marking and encoding in IPv6
Thread-Index: AcuCCQDMT/eR+KmUQ+GE4yOvlcAkyA==
Message-ID: <DBB1DC060375D147AC43F310AD987DCC180E5405D2@ESESSCMS0366.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [conex] Abstract marking and encoding in IPv6
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:29:06 -0000

Hi

Given yesterdays presentation on the abtract encoding mechanism and the IPv6 encoding options my findings are:

+ Encoding in IPv6: To me it seems like the only way to make ConEx commercially attactive is to use some of the bits from the flow label field. It was to me pretty clear that extension headers (including the hop-by-hop options header) are not very useful in this context and it was also explained (Rich Woundy) that the latter are not even useful for experimentation (my interpretation). So what is required here is to convince 6man (and others) that ConEx is a good use case for N bits in the flow label field reserved for ConEx.

+ Encoding of abstract mechanism: Now that I (believe I) understand the green marking (and the necessity of it) it is to me quite obvious that 5 codepoints are needed, thus 3 bits are needed, this leaves 1 unused codepoint waiting for an interesting use case...   

/Ingemar

=================================
INGEMAR JOHANSSON  M.Sc. 
Senior Research Engineer 

Ericsson AB
Multimedia Technologies
Labratoriegränd 11
971 28, Luleå, Sweden
Phone +46-1071 43042
SMS/MMS +46-73 078 3289
ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com
www.ericsson.com 
Visit http://labs.ericsson.com !
=================================