IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-oscore-edhoc-10: (with DISCUSS)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 03 April 2024 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CD3C14F698; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 08:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C4bl2Rr_cW4v; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 08:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73721C14F615; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 08:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eduroam-pool9-388.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-pool9-388.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.71.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4V8pwb12PdzDD9K; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:45:03 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <BB6803D5-7D3B-4F63-A757-B0DE825CD5AD@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 17:45:02 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-oscore-edhoc@ietf.org, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 733851902.5869679-8574942c8e5781267a22766cbe54a2af
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D823F4E7-EC8C-4494-9A61-824103C78BED@tzi.org>
References: <171209295110.36690.2503046078430078938@ietfa.amsl.com> <BB6803D5-7D3B-4F63-A757-B0DE825CD5AD@tzi.org>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/msCADI9qjTR_z7jUmu4NYKdPQAU>
Subject: Re: [core] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-oscore-edhoc-10: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:45:11 -0000

On 2024-04-03, at 16:50, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> (E.g., in fries with ketchup, the fries actually need to be fried.)

We could make this a bit more standing out as in RFC 8881:

   Hence, all assignments to the registry are made on a Standards Action
   basis per Section 4.6 of [63], with Expert Review required.

([63] is an obfuscated reference to RFC 8126, where the section referenced of course actually should be 4.9).  We could then add that RFC 7120 applies.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email