Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algorithms
Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Thu, 11 August 2016 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26EE12D08F for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pingidentity.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LK7Yb7ZBAAaF for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF8E712D5E7 for <cose@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x130so2213028ite.1 for <cose@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pingidentity.com; s=gmail; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7fi0FC3BteFaxG8m4wSNK4LQx1HCre1p+fILy3Zz074=; b=faO8F4SsLMgID+p3CEqlAPMnRSCte6ztH6aALWonyW0Wtyy5kUalH4xR14WSUvFcLy feqavLBMJ+5jNFVkFlWlVIrgZCMG2TCCGacTczw9g3G4SjaLgmWuhy4XdN4S8lxCucLJ j8MGxjoHclA28lWnt2T2yQMXr+pn4wSjWKD80=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7fi0FC3BteFaxG8m4wSNK4LQx1HCre1p+fILy3Zz074=; b=lnPvYUVUKTwHh8+bDotrzsirO7V2cZwYIjckYMNfKbPZSVlQIkfrRQBSkxeI2VGAiK NjV90gA7eCTqVP8kRZ0x+BxV5qvQNkdrrd6UOrjt9p6+2a37OPDlw1jZ5XZXPNsDtEru JOC+YqSlx1tH6TtpYtAT2s8kRH2y0zB0xRjdOhwjyl+EWshybuR5xMGCvn4YX02BEGqR XO/eN/vQ9Qqg0jyqXW2YhQ4gKhR2EoGO8gmDemhZenlBBJEdSgs3hWQV4pC/qJAsfkhF g8gVxFUgT3FxQk7c8ek0l392pa3sgdRiSZhtWsvtYUjUVxK1e5krKgIg1caiuCytx6yD RgJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousxe/p1giUw7UhjwEHxmNahfISiCd/p4RN4v6GT87n4xhzIu8JguIR8d3wkdC5S/+YgC3lkwUUxNw/4Wy3V
X-Received: by 10.36.115.5 with SMTP id y5mr11438152itb.63.1470936053030; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.123.14 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D2BD06DF-12B1-4C65-AD76-6E43ACCE19C3@mit.edu>
References: <D2BD06DF-12B1-4C65-AD76-6E43ACCE19C3@mit.edu>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:20:22 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCQUkKRPJDXeTjKCUgMVpmZOoQiVtepngQf58gkqAzvM2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144990aedc3870539cefcda"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/s6vm8sYLX7X-NSPqYnyUvcsmEOU>
Cc: cose <cose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algorithms
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:20:56 -0000
1) A. And, as I've said several times previously, I think RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 should be included. 2) D but A probably makes sense. 3) E On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote: > Hi all, hope that everyone is recovering from Berlin. As discussed in the > meeting last week, the working group is considering additional work on RSA > and other algorithms in the COSE messages framework. These would be > published in a document separate from the core draft that is now on its > journey to RFC-land. > > The chairs would like to gauge the sentiment of the working group on a > number of items related to this proposed work. Please respond with your > answers to the list. > > > 1) Do you think it’s necessary or worthwhile to define RSA and other > additional algorithms in the COSE messages framework? > > A) Yes, we should do an RSA/other-algs document > B) No, we shouldn’t do an RSA/other-algs document > C) Yes, but not right now > D) I need more information (please ask what you want to know) > E) I don’t give a flying rat whether this gets done or not > > > > 2) If the work is adopted, where should it be done? > > A) Here in COSE (we’ll keep the group open for this item) > B) In other working group (please specify where; note that ACE is a > possible option) > C) I need more information (ask what you want to know) > D) I don’t give a flying rat where this happens > > > > 3) If the work is adopted, which draft is a good starting point? > > A) Jim’s draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schaad-cose-alg-01 > B) Mike’s draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-cose-rsa-00 > C) Some other draft (please tell us which one it is or offer to write it > yourself) > D) I need more information (ask what you want to know) > E) I don’t give a flying rat which document we start with > > > > > We’re going to keep this thread open for two weeks at the AD’s request, > and the chairs will try to make a consensus call at the end of that time > period. > > Thank you, > > — Justin & Kepeng, your COSE chairs > > > * \. - - . > ' _ , -`. > ' _,' _,' > ' ,-' _/ > ' ,-' \ _/ > ' ,' \ _' > ' ' _\' > ' , _,-' \ _________ > \,_,--' \ \\_______\ > \ \\+=+=+=+\ > \ \\=+=+=+=\ > \ \\+=+=+=+\ > \ \\=+=+=+=\________ > \ \\+=+=+=+____----)) > \ \`---------.)))\\ > \ ||+=+=+=+=+=\\ /\\ > \ ||___________\\/ \\ > \ ||------------\\ > ejm \|| \\ > * > > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > >
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Brian Campbell
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Matias Woloski
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… John Bradley
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algorithms Justin Richer