Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algorithms
Matias Woloski <matiasw@gmail.com> Thu, 11 August 2016 16:27 UTC
Return-Path: <matiasw@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD14512D81C for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uF6lqeG7QBmo for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5E012D7C2 for <cose@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c15so1109574oig.0 for <cose@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i9jEcSorHIlcJCvGfXiutIJWADijgUYmQ7fFsOWvCqI=; b=Hjf4RaGi1kzlZYV43qLs8PxtWqjCjClNHeiKz6Wuh2vm+hkxrW/n51EjgZOrdsL0HC OjuUKYNPPGbKxgi2QumK9JN4lTcOPu+nrPqhp9ZG4QZNW0OgwJ81YBDhGDa8IJr8OW6G ORRFf9IYYsXZBH9bZr2N0Hgcy0rbU+Eg8HSsIIVlNCGsatmYO4fPYgeOalCZz9uS/oIC JHXu7EAOw3qep40RjTE/+VqRB94aunPvfK5PznteBZ/9wUvKF4mkZ0oeWvqaY3vBoYMJ WM1AW+px27KeUaRikGCH+ExRG+GeCp26ESm6UWkFqoq505YRg0kVmU5VDEvi4/cIan09 MZOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i9jEcSorHIlcJCvGfXiutIJWADijgUYmQ7fFsOWvCqI=; b=UagNXlKfhJURILd96sayp5HKjs7ug2j3nCoEiC2JjJQSXIowSHlaArSKlv7Ac2cESD DDhfAdP1kFOxO5rt7gXHITG8j6wWL9sWgM025dj7mZORMHecfBVepSAia8QrtzZSkiik ex0V05w0oBC7olN5w8FdlcUTFsarj7wMUYKU4kB0ZgHdeSoI4sY/GXvrHHwTBHOFZtpU 6niGfb5MBfUj7sSf7QIjLk/DDhW+5awAb8a4nQyG5tgi5m20h6auPNsaiSxic47U5cLZ 6jptUyksw6nVQcZ4o8Cr4rsYd2ZuBXjjYjmmhQcXAZjXeFBEq21wnRO3OkyeDVorlUBO 8ugQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousvMiHMeBkAmnOglMjt+Y1GZ55S5/eI9OK7TVKBV9vcfU5lR/Nrei2Tl/mof2rruwd1ITrfNqcY/eerRQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.216.4 with SMTP id p4mr5851923oig.140.1470932872988; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.4.71 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D2BD06DF-12B1-4C65-AD76-6E43ACCE19C3@mit.edu>
References: <D2BD06DF-12B1-4C65-AD76-6E43ACCE19C3@mit.edu>
From: Matias Woloski <matiasw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:27:32 -0300
Message-ID: <CAK+KdNW8PjNV+jyUY_m7fGzgw+DZcTcpMqM52tnRhMU9BnHzdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d3576620fb40539ce3f4e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/zv6lbjPmxZCMHYuFF-e9HZmBBoo>
Cc: cose <cose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algorithms
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:27:55 -0000
inline On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote: > Hi all, hope that everyone is recovering from Berlin. As discussed in the > meeting last week, the working group is considering additional work on RSA > and other algorithms in the COSE messages framework. These would be > published in a document separate from the core draft that is now on its > journey to RFC-land. > > The chairs would like to gauge the sentiment of the working group on a > number of items related to this proposed work. Please respond with your > answers to the list. > > > 1) Do you think it’s necessary or worthwhile to define RSA and other > additional algorithms in the COSE messages framework? > > A) Yes, we should do an RSA/other-algs document > B) No, we shouldn’t do an RSA/other-algs document > C) Yes, but not right now > D) I need more information (please ask what you want to know) > E) I don’t give a flying rat whether this gets done or not > > A) RS can be implemented in pretty much any language, easily enough. > > 2) If the work is adopted, where should it be done? > > A) Here in COSE (we’ll keep the group open for this item) > B) In other working group (please specify where; note that ACE is a > possible option) > C) I need more information (ask what you want to know) > D) I don’t give a flying rat where this happens > > D) > > 3) If the work is adopted, which draft is a good starting point? > > A) Jim’s draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schaad-cose-alg-01 > B) Mike’s draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-cose-rsa-00 > C) Some other draft (please tell us which one it is or offer to write it > yourself) > D) I need more information (ask what you want to know) > E) I don’t give a flying rat which document we start with > > E) > > > We’re going to keep this thread open for two weeks at the AD’s request, > and the chairs will try to make a consensus call at the end of that time > period. > > Thank you, > > — Justin & Kepeng, your COSE chairs > > > * \. - - . > ' _ , -`. > ' _,' _,' > ' ,-' _/ > ' ,-' \ _/ > ' ,' \ _' > ' ' _\' > ' , _,-' \ _________ > \,_,--' \ \\_______\ > \ \\+=+=+=+\ > \ \\=+=+=+=\ > \ \\+=+=+=+\ > \ \\=+=+=+=\________ > \ \\+=+=+=+____----)) > \ \`---------.)))\\ > \ ||+=+=+=+=+=\\ /\\ > \ ||___________\\/ \\ > \ ||------------\\ > ejm \|| \\ > * > > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > ᐧ
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Brian Campbell
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Matias Woloski
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… John Bradley
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algori… Jim Schaad
- [COSE] Adoption of RSA and alternative algorithms Justin Richer