Re: [Crypto-panel] Reviews for 4 PAKEs (PAKE slection process)

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Thu, 13 February 2020 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EAE1200BA for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 01:00:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcZrzmRtxv-3 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 01:00:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B411200B6 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 01:00:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id x14so5624674ljd.13 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 01:00:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ox14nGJblUlol/KpBikjtT+25PmcBRrPW2kPr0ZVIZM=; b=EK8dh36maTGin35GycsgLJD9qmZ743Gn2MC4VDyfOO2mIowu2vyA7S6Nt2jdGVYamx EuZClEdS9vh3CH8Dqu1pC2sgJIeCDtkjob0haO4llE27R3swOrR7fbUEeSWPZRz2xi0e 2KiwXKE4lxBv7mHpUBuDYYZpo9X1EiQ2X0ZNiAowT1LkyvskqrHoRpQ/uREP+IGF6Sgv aLYWPx43dp3fS+4KO6c2pjUgenbQ+BAWmz5mBOxCKAXy7c0SM1+Lyd0VPkUEreDNdH1T CTP6kx6eEy2MGwqWfoiDwMpXQe7HZkHA+Tee5c2MUrf+KAGSEnbVLbzJZoRIVsumXea2 Ad4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ox14nGJblUlol/KpBikjtT+25PmcBRrPW2kPr0ZVIZM=; b=ZlpTW4l9kENMVEsliy0OV8oSk0ZiaPIZfKF1kUYj9X7Y6sWqs90WrjBKGihlNWwZkr 3dVm4ACydxUai7VN8skC1rKUqRyn+TMaj8KggQhoJOQ3ze3RLJVRO/lcTcijOZZapies 5Grd0LOCxt1D9J2AA4RpEoEEVuum2NWRNYxM15aLW0NW2FTyILEN5j5DG/P2zanZ8sfx aiXCfLqiWGM0EfITTEnP4INRIqZi61qq2WBIHKoJf7CDGQH64NqMOjjOi/Zy/FJtP4B8 lcCNeuTflqJqkZ97gPwed4u6oIEMamQAiMd5E7pLkDxwsBBixHkHAf/KOEaBDF5YBGZg N9TQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXN0KeAHTVhHxRnPCVzgtO7iwqHR7hEwrD/bkJ6r1edjg3jQzy7 O9UD+Uvw/MDpDuKBsBj1FpciiE+dRV9EQmLW/c4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzNyFg63Udkf/qXZrxWFp8yNDYD+eg5g2Sf5FTfSGS/J6V8KAR6BgO797/CfUrBFcEYu+zckwfSuHiyGm4ja+c=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8758:: with SMTP id q24mr10671025ljj.157.1581584437251; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 01:00:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6=-BPyYUDXbVi9s+LFfjtPHQmhPs5jyLWpsTm6=ChzrpQ@mail.gmail.com> <FCD07548-47B4-472A-ADE4-450F23AD1C06@ieee.org>
In-Reply-To: <FCD07548-47B4-472A-ADE4-450F23AD1C06@ieee.org>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:00:51 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6n6r=Va4AT9StE9uEMMhR4mEPDuQzNe9JhTftPCjZk38g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bjoern Tackmann <bjoern.tackmann@ieee.org>
Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009090d1059e715263"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/KM__94HQp2BRXUFQiAn1d6haUN0>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Reviews for 4 PAKEs (PAKE slection process)
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:00:42 -0000

Dear Björn,

Many thanks for your reply and for your confirmation!

>> I’ll most likely get around to it only in March, though.
We need the reviews before March, 10th – is it OK for you?

Regards,
Stanislav

On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 23:11, Bjoern Tackmann <bjoern.tackmann@ieee.org>
wrote:

> Dear Stanislav,
>
> sure, I’ll update my review, I’ll also adapt it to some insights I got
> through further discussions with Hugo and Stanislaw Jarecki. I’ll most
> likely get around to it only in March, though.
>
> Cheers,
> Björn
>
>
> > On Feb 11, 2020, at 7:42 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Crypto Review Panel members,
> >
> > Due to the plan of the second round of the PAKE selection process, we're
> approaching Stage 4 of Round 2:
> >
> > Stage 4: February, 12th - March, 10th
> > Crypto Review Panel members prepare new overall reviews (for all 4
> remaining PAKEs) taking into account both the reviews obtained on Round 1
> and new information obtained during Round 2.
> >
> > Let me remind you, that we have 4 candidates passed to Round 2: CPace,
> SPAKE2 (balanced) and AuCPace, OPAQUE (augmented).
> >
> > The authors of the protocols have provided their answers to the
> additional questions that were asked after IETF 106 meeting (see
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#questions-for-round-2
> ).
> >
> > Their answers have been provided in the mailing list (see links at
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#answers-on-round-2
> ).
> >
> > The previous overall reviews by Bjoern Tackmann, myself, Russ Housley
> and Yaron Sheffer are available at
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#overall-reviews-by-crypto-review-panel
> . All other reviews are available here:
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#summary-of-reviews
> >
> > So now we need reviews (each review should consider all 4 protocols -
> otherwise it will be more difficult to compare) for the remaining
> candidates. The reviews should be done before March, 10th.
> >
> > First of all, it will be very important if Bjoern, Russ and Yaron could
> do their new (or, better to say, updated) reviews, since they have done
> them at the previous round. It will be great if Scott could participate,
> since he provided very important reviews on certain issues.
> > Also since now we have Chloe, Julia, Karthikeyan, Thomas, Jean-Philippe
> and Jon on board.
> > In this process we need as many good reviews as possible, so we ask all
> of you to consider your participation.
> >
> > Please let us know, whether you are ready to do this, before February,
> 13th.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Stanislav (on behalf of the CFRG chairs)
> >
> >
>
>