Re: [Crypto-panel] Reviews for 4 PAKEs (PAKE slection process)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65C81209A6 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:47:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vaXY92J0h4s9 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1436B120987 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A1D300B42 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:21:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id UlgCwJ_Ko43Y for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:21:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.0.166] (wsip-72-194-193-110.dc.dc.cox.net [72.194.193.110]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9413F3005D5; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:21:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <7E818D37-B68A-4154-87AC-B2E044371BC6@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E8C2A981-3E18-4A59-8B1C-84AFE2E49BBD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:47:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAMr0u6=-BPyYUDXbVi9s+LFfjtPHQmhPs5jyLWpsTm6=ChzrpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, Bjoern Tackmann <bjoern.tackmann@ieee.org>, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
References: <CAMr0u6=-BPyYUDXbVi9s+LFfjtPHQmhPs5jyLWpsTm6=ChzrpQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/l9sxaXnGBPnO8pppR0lf79eVDkU>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Reviews for 4 PAKEs (PAKE slection process)
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:47:47 -0000

Yes, I am prepared to update my review based on the updates.

Russ

> On Feb 11, 2020, at 1:42 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Crypto Review Panel members,
> 
> Due to the plan of the second round of the PAKE selection process, we're approaching Stage 4 of Round 2:
> 
> Stage 4: February, 12th - March, 10th
> Crypto Review Panel members prepare new overall reviews (for all 4 remaining PAKEs) taking into account both the reviews obtained on Round 1 and new information obtained during Round 2.
> 
> Let me remind you, that we have 4 candidates passed to Round 2: CPace, SPAKE2 (balanced) and AuCPace, OPAQUE (augmented).
> 
> The authors of the protocols have provided their answers to the additional questions that were asked after IETF 106 meeting (see https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#questions-for-round-2 <https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#questions-for-round-2>).
> 
> Their answers have been provided in the mailing list (see links at https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#answers-on-round-2 <https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#answers-on-round-2>).
> 
> The previous overall reviews by Bjoern Tackmann, myself, Russ Housley and Yaron Sheffer are available at https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#overall-reviews-by-crypto-review-panel <https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#overall-reviews-by-crypto-review-panel> . All other reviews are available here: https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#summary-of-reviews <https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#summary-of-reviews>
> 
> So now we need reviews (each review should consider all 4 protocols - otherwise it will be more difficult to compare) for the remaining candidates. The reviews should be done before March, 10th. 
> 
> First of all, it will be very important if Bjoern, Russ and Yaron could do their new (or, better to say, updated) reviews, since they have done them at the previous round. It will be great if Scott could participate, since he provided very important reviews on certain issues.
> Also since now we have Chloe, Julia, Karthikeyan, Thomas, Jean-Philippe and Jon on board.
> In this process we need as many good reviews as possible, so we ask all of you to consider your participation.
> 
> Please let us know, whether you are ready to do this, before February, 13th.
> 
> Regards,
> Stanislav (on behalf of the CFRG chairs)
> 
>